- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 44,482
- Reaction score
- 448
I am not gonna answer the stupid question in the title.
Why are you post in this thread at first place?
I am not gonna answer the stupid question in the title.
Why do you think it's stupid?I am not gonna answer the stupid question in the title.
Because it makes homework sounds like a bad thing which it's not. For example, "Should guns be banned?" makes more sense because alot of people think guns are dangerous or bad. Therefore, "Should homework be banned?" makes no sense. Homework is always good and important for education. Period. Only lazy kids at school would say yes because they hate homework.Why do you think it's stupid?
So, you would rather the kids not have homework... but make friends and excel in sports? Why not both?Hah, the ages old debate. I would say nix the homework and focus on sports and social skills. Kids are so lacking in those department those days. That's the real world preparation, social skills.
I am not gonna answer the stupid question in the title.
Too bad, I am not going to close this thread for you, anyway.
It's a ridiculous debate since homework will never be banned anyway.Well, have you read some explanations and studies in someone's dA journal?
It's a ridiculous debate since homework will never be banned anyway.
I voted no, but felt a little leery of going that way. Homework is important as long as it is within reason. there seems to be too much homework these days, and on stuff that is not gone over in class. How is a student supposed to be able to do the work if they don't know it? The government is requiring so much from the school districts, which then trickles down to the teachers. They are then not paid enough to do all they are required to do and our children are paying the price. When I was in school (yes, back in the older days), we would have class discussion, go over the chapter or whatever and then were assigned homework on what was discussed in the chapter. The last time one of my kids got homework in the public school system, there was no class discussion and in looking in the textbook, there is nothing that would help my child know what was going on. It was basically, nothing but questions and answer lines to be filled in. It was set up more like the answer book as opposed to a textbook and that's all they had for the school. We had to go online to get information. In my mind, that was wrong. This was for a math class.
My son hated homework which he missed many times but he made it through high school. I just couldn't believe it with my own eyes. Of course, he got alot of C and D so he was to blame for low grades, not me or teachers. I was strict but he was so stubborn. In fact, some or alot of teenagers are hard to control.Nowadays, parents just let their kids watch television or play video games without any mention of homework. When the kids then get low grades, the parents are quick to blame the teacher for making the classes or homework too difficult or too much for the kids. :roll:
I believe that assigning homework makes the teacher lazy. If the teacher makes sure to really teach the subject, that each child understands. The child takes up a real interest in the subject and will study up at home of their own accord due to love of learning. If the love for learning is not there, it can't be forced. If forced it will only go further downhill for the child.
You're right. It varies by class.I'm going to offer a young educator's perspective on this...
Some classes can handle homework. Some classes can't.
It's the teacher's duty to be strategic about his or her teaching method so that it that allows the most amount of learning possible within the given restraints of time, money, and space.
I have had classes where I will give out homework, and enough students will do the homework that we can talk about the ideas from the homework in class to foster an informative discussion about the class topic.
I've also had classes where no one does the homwork, so the class becomes very structured in order to be able to cover all the required material. 5 minutes intro, 10 minutes hands-on, 5 minute lecture, 10 minutes pair-up, 2 minutes to explain exit-activity (students have to finish this activity to leave class), then 5 minutes to finish that activity... there's no room for discussion in this kind of class format, but at least everyone tries to do the work.
Usually when a class does not do homework, a class-wide discussion isn't appropriate anyway (someone will say something inappropriate, or cause a distraction that takes away from instruction time), so as a result, a more structured classroom is better for them in two ways because:
1. they will have a chance to try all the stuff taught in class
2. they will get into less trouble because there is less chances to get into trouble.
Now, I'm not saying that not doing homework is the symptom of bad students, or that it is necessarily a bad thing. It just means that the classroom will operate in a different way to make sure all the students have a chance to learn.