[
What is your definition of crazy?al.
We shouldnt use our own pet definitions here, i understsnd its a post modern world, as such we can define any term any way we like. But that doesnt help the discussion.
So if we are going to use the term insane, considerng this is a case of murder, we should use either. The medical definition of insanity, thus i asked what evedence do we have from qualified doctors that he indeed was mentally ill and insane, or use the legel definition of insanity.
Are you really arguing every murderer is eaither of those? If so then how can the state put in prison the truly sick?
If he lived would you be arguing for him to be found legally insane?
Weird as this is...in this me and the prosecution would be agreeing.
He was not sick. He was not insane. He full well knew right from wrong, he planned it. He acted..he murdered.
Being not rational and full-out crazy don't need to be the same thing.
Why wouldn't I believe it? Evil people can be sane or insane. Also, not all insane people do evil things.
Never said it would be.al.
So what are you trying to argue? That he was irrational or that he was insane?
Why woulndt you belive what? That men are fully capible to kill eachother and still be found in the right mind? Is that what your asking?
Explain to me the rational of killing former coworkers as revenge for the deaths of totally unrelated people in another state.
That may have been his reason but it certainly isn't rational.
Explain to me the rational of flying planes in two buildings, killing thousands for an event unrelated and on the other side of the world?
He states why he did it.
I can see no reason to ignore his statements and indeed cop it up to a babbling madman.
His revenge was politicaly motivated, just as the guy who killed those people in the church was politicaly motavated.
Why are we not dismissing his manifesto and ignoring his statments also?
Did he kill those people because he is sick and insane, or did he kill them for exactly why he claims he killed them? Why take his word for it, and not this guys?