Tousi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2003
- Messages
- 18,461
- Reaction score
- 184
I'm not going to argue. I know the facts.
I think I'll be smart to remember this......
I'm not going to argue. I know the facts.
well, we had alot of sex in deafie school, if thats what you asking, and washroom stalls had our names on.it for ************ (dance with self...)stalls, the dorms allot of.sex, school cant stop,my class is about culture and the way men and women act a certain way or do certain things based on what the norm in their culture. some cultures women stay home and men are the only ones to work. is there something like that in the deaf culture?
well, we had alot of sex in deafie school, if thats what you asking, and washroom stalls had our names on.it for ************ (dance with self...)stalls, the dorms allot of.sex, school cant stop,
Hearie kids learn.sex ed from books, we learn real fast in.dorms
I'm pretty sure a lot of "Hearie" kids learn about sex in basements while in jr. high or early high school. Also, since you're referring to the "dorms", I'm assuming you mean kids who live on campus...there are a lot of on-campus living schools for jr high and high school for students who are "Hearies" and I'm sure they learned about sex the same way...
Also, some "Hearie" public schools don't offer sex education, hence the reason why kids as young as jr. high end up pregnant
I didnt know hearie kids can live in somw schools..cool
yes i talk deaie school resedent dorms. Allot of sex...
Hearie friends jelous...us deafies...
Its good.be deaf we tel them.."-)
o i cbut it sure doesn't seem to have helped you proofread what you have written before you post it!
That's cuz he spent too much time having sex instead of studying English. [emoji23] [emoji108] [emoji197]But it sure doesn't seem to have helped you proofread what you have written before you post it!
That's cuz he spent too much time having sex instead of studying English. [emoji23] [emoji108] [emoji197]
Too bad you don't "English like a hearie" on this forum.True..and no one like english, many refuse and so just ASL..in english, we just put head down.or not look and sign with our deafie, ..hearie teacher would go.crazy..craaaazy.......try force like nazi....we sign away laugh...only thing school can do is send us to our rooms....
Lol
Yep
Work like charms. but my english is real good all signs considered...
I can english like hearie and english as deafie, float like butterfly sting like bee...
Mmm
Too bad you don't "English like a hearie" on this forum.
I knew you would say that. This is a forum visited by many people who are culturally as well as pathologically hearing. When they see your poor written English in response to their questions, I'm sure they just assume you are poorly educated.english is good good. But all deaf, is deaf forum. Im like shakespear if he deafie, but not bald...so.....many. Many deafie say my english is great...and is good. No problem.
sign.for deafie anyway engLish babalebable...(lips flap) why?
This deafie forum...
I knew you would say that. This is a forum visited by many people who are culturally as well as pathologically hearing. When they see your poor written English in response to their questions, I'm sure they just assume you are poorly educated.
Accepted academic practice is to respond to the audience you are addressing in the type of language that is most appropriate for, and understandable to them.
You just portray a negative stereotype of the Deaf and of Deaf Education in general.
My problem is that whether you realize it or not you are perpetuating that stereotype and supporting Audist arguments by not using proper English grammer and syntax(when addressing previously stated audiences). The average deaf student graduates high school with a 4 th grade reading and writing level. . I was correcting your incorrect statement and assumptions about this forum. Especially when most of your comments in your "deafie" text are on threads started by culturally hearing people. There are still many hearing professionals that will tell hearing parents that oralism is better and that signing leads to poor written and reading language skills.Whats your plm man ?
My problem is that whether you realize it or not you are perpetuating that stereotype and supporting Audist arguments by not using proper English grammer and syntax(when addressing previously stated audiences). The average deaf student graduates high school with a 4 th grade reading and writing level. . I was correcting your incorrect statement and assumptions about this forum. Especially when most of your comments in your "deafie" text are on threads started by culturally hearing people. There are still many hearing professionals that will tell hearing parents that oralism is better and that signing leads to poor written and reading language skills.
It is obvious you do not possess the knowledge to properly support the use on ASL versus oralism in the educational setting. I respect that you value our Deaf culture. But your poor representation of our culture to hearing community that comes here to the hearing aid and cochlear implant forum is beyond annoying.
Personally i do not believe you can present a well thought out argument that is relevant to the question asked in "hearie English," otherwise know as proper English to the rest of us.
Now if a parent comes here asking if they should get a CI or use ASL with their child I shall be happy to demonstrate a well organized and through argument on the topic. So the parent can make a truely informed consent decision. Which by the way, almost no CI centers actually do.
Bebonang
My biggest problem with reading what hoichi writes is simple proofreading for the most part. Like Reba says it is more a matter of his typing than his English.
You are inclined to phrase things differently than I am used to but it is easy to read because you seem to proofread for typos from things like hitting the key next to the one you want. Also, you put a blank line between paragraphs. These things make it much easier to read.