Regents take aim at deaf school

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
6
Regents take aim at deaf school | argusleader.com | Argus Leader

With only five students left on the 14-acre Sioux Falls campus, the Board of Regents wants to close the South Dakota School for the Deaf at the end of the school year.

The bilingual-bicultural program, which uses American Sign Language and English, would move to a mainstream school. Meanwhile, students interested in a residential school could be transferred to a deaf school in another state, probably Iowa.

The moves would save an estimated $678,000 next year by cutting the equivalent of 13.9 full-time jobs, according to a budget document prepared for the South Dakota Legislature's joint appropriations committee.

Enrollment at the deaf school campus has been dwindling for years as hearing aid improvements have made it easier for hearing-impaired students to attend mainstream schools. And when the school closed its dormitories and dropped basic classes, families found fewer reasons to sign up.


The bulk of the assistance the regents now provide to hearing-impaired students is at mainstream schools throughout the state. The regents' 12 outreach workers - twice the number from last year - are helping 390 such students this year.

Regents: Numbers create inefficiency
With so few students on campus, maintaining a separate school for deaf students has become exceedingly expensive: $288,000 per student this year, Board of Regents Executive Director Jack Warner told lawmakers last month.

"I certainly get very concerned about what that costs, but more important than costs what we're able to deliver when we don't have a critical mass of students," Warner said in an interview Monday.

The plan to outsource the bilingual-bicultural program looks a lot like what the regents did this school year with the auditory-oral program. The regents are paying the Brandon Valley School District to educate those 11 students at Fred Assam Elementary. No school district has been identified for the bilingual-bicultural program.

Warner said the Brandon Valley program costs the state $48,000 per student, while out-of-state residential placement would cost $90,000 per student.

As for the deaf school grounds, the regents propose leasing portions of it to local government. The proceeds would supplant some of the state general fund dollars that pay for deaf education.

Mismanagement, deaf leaders says
If lawmakers close the deaf school, it won't be without a fight from deaf community leaders, who attribute the school's decline to mismanagement.

Bobbie Beth Scoggins, president of the National Association of the Deaf, said the deaf community was allowed no input on the regents' plans and the campus still could be an important resource for deaf education.

The regents' plan is not well thought-out, she said, arguing the Department of Education is in a better position to make such decisions.

"We need better educational leaders in this state and we feel the Department of Education would have the people on board who... could at least begin to address some of the (issues)," she said.

Senate Joint Resolution 1 proposed amending the state constitution to remove the deaf school from the responsibilities of the regents, making way for a possible transfer to the DOE. But its sponsor, Sen. Al Novstrup, R-Aberdeen, killed the bill last week, saying he's confident the parties can resolve their differences without a constitutional amendment.

"Everybody is willing to talk," he explained.

Nikki Darland, coordinator for the Coalition for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children, said keeping the deaf school in the constitution affords those students some protection. Nonetheless, she feels strongly that the DOE should take control.

Sen. Dan Ahlers, D-Dell Rapids, also wants to see deaf education shifted to the DOE.

"The ideal goal, as I see it, would be for a contract between the Board of Regents and Department of Education to assume control of the school," he said.

Warner said that barring a constitutional amendment, the regents will stay involved in deaf education. But that doesn't mean the regents won't collaborate with the DOE.

"We will enter discussions with the Department of Education to see how we can deliver this more effectively," he said.
 
ok this is one case ware I can see closeing the school to be a good thing only 12 kids the other 398 are in mainstream and likely dong well , so whay are these 12 kids not in mainstream what service can be offered to them to allow them a better education ?
 
As long as the programs stay the same does it really matter where they are doing it? Is there anything wrong with having good DHH programs at mainstream schools? Especially in this case where it's obvious the enrollment is low and the cost is hard to justify for just 11 students.

I think if they keep the programs the same there should be no problem. In fact I wish the mainstream school systems would adopt the DHH programs that are developed at the deaf schools so that parents would have more choices in terms of where to send their deaf kids without having to worry about if they are getting the best deaf education.
 
Well, they are not gonna close that program. I don't have the citations for that but the are not gunna close the school.
 
12 students? That's ridiculous. The whole point of residential schools is to create a strong social environment for deaf children. Interaction with only 12 other people will have serious consequences on their social development, and I would bet it would also impact their signing development as well.
 
the other 398 are in mainstream and likely dong well , so whay are these 12 kids not in mainstream what service can be offered to them to allow them a better education ?
Kate how do you know the mainstream is a better education?
I have to say... I think they need to advertise for more deaf kids. Maybe even try to attract dhh kids from other states.
A formal mainstream program can be awesome.........BUT, some kids need the stabilty of a res school. For example some kids may be from families where the emotional-social dynamics aren't too healthy. Others may be from very poor cities or very poor trailer parks or from school districts that really can't offer anything, and are too far away from other school districts to offer anything.
 
Yea, 12 kids is not a good number. I love deaf schools but 12? I wish LRE was never implemented.
 
Yea, 12 kids is not a good number. I love deaf schools but 12? I wish LRE was never implemented.

LRE is why Deaf kids CAN go to Deaf school! Right in the language of the law it says "direct communication with instructor and peers", that is why Deaf schools can be the "least restrictive".
 
LRE is why Deaf kids CAN go to Deaf school! Right in the language of the law it says "direct communication with instructor and peers", that is why Deaf schools can be the "least restrictive".

I wish it was that case but that is what public schools use to fight against sending deaf kids to deaf schools. LRE was passed to mainstream children with special needs as much as they could. So, to the eyes of the law, by sending a deaf child is the most restrictive environment when it is actually the least restrictive.

Read the definition of what it means..

"Least restrictive environment" means that a student who has a disability should have the opportunity to be educated with non-disabled peers, to the greatest extent possible. They should have access to the general education curriculum, extracurricular activities, or any other program that non-disabled peers would be able to access. The student should be provided with supplementary aids and services necessary to achieve educational goals if placed in a setting with non-disabled peers. Academically a resource room may be available within the school for specialized instruction, with typically no more than two hours per day of services for a student with learning disabilities.[1] Should the nature or severity of his or her disability prevent the student from achieving these goals in a regular education setting, then the student would be placed in a more restrictive environment, such as a special school or a hospital program. Generally, the less opportunity a student has to interact and learn with non-disabled peers, the more the placement is considered to be restricted.
 
Last edited:
Kate how do you know the mainstream is a better education?
I have to say... I think they need to advertise for more deaf kids. Maybe even try to attract dhh kids from other states.
A formal mainstream program can be awesome.........BUT, some kids need the stabilty of a res school. For example some kids may be from families where the emotional-social dynamics aren't too healthy. Others may be from very poor cities or very poor trailer parks or from school districts that really can't offer anything, and are too far away from other school districts to offer anything.

because I was in boces and that was nothing more then a holding tank, I believe in this case keeping a whole school open for only 12 kinds when 300 more have been mainstreamed ( and given interpreters and other needed service) is rather wasteful. no as for the crap home situation sending a kid away wont fix it , it is a lame way "to get rid of a kid"
as for a district not having the money kid with disability usually have the option to go to a neighboring district who can help them ( usually paid by the state)
service can suck all the way around but this school only has 12 students and not all of them in the same grade likly all in the same class that is not a good modle of education as most of them would be studying on thier own. if the parents of these kids want them in a residential program then in a bigger school with more social interaction and more actual teaching with peers in the same grade is going to be a better option.


I am starting to ramble but thier are a good number of reason why only having 12 students at a school can cause problems for the students in them getting a good education , so for now i'm just going to leave it as an opinipn and list facts latter or maybe give it it's on topic.
 
No matter what, a teacher in the mainstream is always going to use his teaching style that is designed specifically for hearing kids. And hearing kids will find visual teaching a little boring.

Phonic, physic using sounds, TV, etc.
 
as for a district not having the money kid with disability usually have the option to go to a neighboring district who can help them ( usually paid by the state)
service can suck all the way around but this school only has 12 students and not all of them in the same grade likly all in the same class that is not a good modle of education as most of them would be studying on thier own. if the parents of these kids want them in a residential program then in a bigger school with more social interaction and more actual teaching with peers in the same grade is going to be a better option.
Usually yes, but this is South Dakota. Meaning VERY rural. We're not talking NY State rural, (meaning an hour or so to the nearest Deaf program) There's ALSO MAJOR (like third world) poverty in South Dakota. Ever hear of Pine Ridge? (huge rates of fetal alhohol syndrome, major poverty, major drug and substance abuse (eg using Lysol) In the case of major poverty a res school can act as a stablizling force.
I'm surprised there aren't more kids. Like even Pine Ringers who may have only mild losses would get a better education at Deaf School, then on the Ridge.
And, I do know that BOCES is a holding tank, but there's a huge difference between BOCES (which is more general special ed rather then dhh ed) and deaf school/program
 
Back
Top