- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
I'm not a know-it-all; I want to know more.Then why all the questions if you've been around for a while?
I said I've been around "a while," not "forever."
I'm not a know-it-all; I want to know more.Then why all the questions if you've been around for a while?
How to handle finances is learned from parents unless you go to college and get a degree in it. It is not something you are born with, it is not something you are taught at school.
In fact poor people of all classes are discouraged from learning it.
Naive because she's never had to experience racism. That's white privilege.
So it is up to the poor person, Black or whatever, growing up in a poor neighborhood where the schools are under par, and they are taught they have no chance in life -- To get out and acquire the right skills.
Yeah, that is a fair way to do things.
Society should have come up with that one a long time ago.
Here's a little more pot stirring, food for thought.
Top 400 richest people in America according to Forbes:
The Richest People in America 2010 - Forbes.com
First asian is Patrick Soon-Shiong at #46 with 5.6bill,
first black is Oprah at #130 with 2.7bill,
first hispanic - well, can be open for debate, but I see the first Italian (not necessarily hispanic) at #66, John Paul DeJoria the former homeless guy.
You don't know what "she" has acknowledged or witnessed. You also don't know what "one" has said or done.She has surely witnessed it, however. She simply refuses to acknowledge what is obvious. If it is acknowledged as wrong and inequitable, then one is obligated to speak out against it.
Are you saying that the black professionals and students with whom I work don't exist? Are you saying that my successful black neighbors and relatives don't exist? Are you saying that the things they tell me about their lives are lies? Are you saying that their opinions about race and success are not real?
It's true that I've not personally experienced blatant racism, only sexism. That doesn't mean I don't know what goes on in the world. I've been around a while.
You don't know what "she" has acknowledged or witnessed. You also don't know what "one" has said or done.
Then again, this thread topic isn't about "she", so I'll ignore any further personal posts discussing posters in the third person.
Same thing with commodities trading: you need at least $750 to do anything. It makes me shake my head to hear well-off people say, "Well, invest your money!" Most poor people cannot afford to invest, particularly with so little return from it. The rich get richer because they have money to invest, simple as that.
Outliers. They do not prove or disprove anything.
Hispanics: The net worth of Hispanic households decreased from $18,359 in 2005 to $6,325 in 2009. The percentage drop—66%—was the largest among all groups. Hispanics derived nearly two-thirds of their net worth in 2005 from home equity and are more likely to reside in areas where the housing meltdown was concentrated. Thus, the housing downturn had a deep impact on them. Their net worth also diminished because of a 42% rise in median levels of debt they carried in the form of unsecured liabilities (credit card debt, education loans, etc.).
Blacks: The net worth of black households fell from $12,124 in 2005 to $5,677 in 2009, a decline of 53%. Like Hispanics, black households drew a large share (59%) of their net worth from home equity in 2005. Thus, the housing downturn had a strong impact on their net worth. Blacks also took on more unsecured debt during the economic downturn, with the median level rising by 27%.
Whites: The drop in the wealth of white households was modest in comparison, falling 16% from $134,992 in 2005 to $113,149 in 2009. White households were also affected by the housing crisis. But home equity accounts for relatively less of their total net worth (44% in 2005), and that served to lessen the impact of the housing bust. Median levels of unsecured debt among whites rose by 32%.
Asians: In 2005 median Asian household wealth had been greater than the median for white households, but by 2009 Asians lost their place at the top of the wealth hierarchy. Their net worth fell from $168,103 in 2005 to $78,066 in 2009, a drop of 54%. Like Hispanics, they are geographically concentrated in places such as California that were hit hard by the housing market meltdown. The arrival of new Asian immigrants since 2004 also contributed significantly to the estimated decline in the overall wealth of this racial group. Absent the immigrants who arrived during this period, the median wealth of Asian households is estimated to have dropped 31% from 2005 to 2009. Asians account for about 5% of the U.S. population.
you will see there are definitely some outliers that need to be eliminated from the findings. Atleast the top 5% in whites, because it's pretty obvious.
Can you honestly tell me that for someone who comes from a poor background but makes the same income as me can even invest? I just googled and picked a random stock, you need to have AT LEAST $2,500 to buy the stock. When you are up to here with college loans, living expenses, car expenses and so on, why are you going to buy risky stocks? Even if you paid off your loans, why would you invest in stocks rather than a house?
Then why all the questions if you've been around for a while?
conversation
And they manipulate policy to insure that the stratification of society remains in place.
I'm asking you for your solution. That includes listing the inequities and then giving the solution for each inequity.