What will "not having any patience for it anymore" translate into in the future? You don't hafta answer if ya don't wanna.....
Being treated "different" does have different translations. Thanks for pointing that out.
Being treated differently because I cannot hear can have positive and negative meanings. Suppose someone speaks slightly louder, slower and more concisely to me than they would someone else - I am being treated differently - but in a positive way.
Suppose another person oversees this and thinks the person is doing this because I am mentally challenged. Suppose they copy this behaviour and
treat me as if I am mentally challenged.
Maybe they really thought I was mentally challenged... and thought they were being "nice".
A miscommunication has occurred in such an illustration. I
DO have patience for honest errors such as that - however annoying they may be.
However, suppose a person has been told numerous times that the above illustration is simply not the case. That there is no mental handicap, but a physical limitation on an ability to communicate verbally.
Suppose the individual intentionally makes communication more difficult out of self entertainment purposes. Then ... that individual was told to stop, but they continue.
That is harrassment. That is what I have no patience for.
Now, I know it is probably the "wise" thing to report this to an employer for documentation purposes.
However, the supervisor or employer is not the individual being harrassed.
Furthermore, reporting it to an employer usually only means a "write up" and a stern talking to since usually there is no proof.
That still means I have to work in an uncomfortable environment when that person is there and continues the behaviour
when no one is looking and there are
absolutely no witnesses.
So why don't I just quit? That seems to be a common question in situations such as this. Here is my question - why should I have to quit when the person breaking the law should be fired?
Since I have experienced a far more severe form of harrassment at a different job and at a different time - and a similar occurence was happening at this job, I thought the same pattern was going to develop and I wanted to nip in the bud before it got to full bloom.
In the situation where I experienced far more severe harrassment, I had to endure a year and a half of constant beratement, ridicule and unease because my boss didn't like the fact he had to work with a HoH individual that made HIS life so much more complicated than it had to be blah blah blah. It took a year and a half for his boss to have all the "t'"s crossed and the "i's" dotted and for my complaints to be "documented" as well as several other employees that also felt the same exact way for him to actually be fired.
Why?
Why did it take so long? Why did I have to endure that for a year and a half?
Why couldn't I just provide solid proof to the authorities and had a restraining order put on him? Why is it "illegal" to provide absolute proof of illegal activity? Makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
In Georgia, it is not illegal to record as long as ONE party knows the conversation is being recorded. Not BOTH parties. That means, I can record
my own conversations with others and I do not need their permission to do so. No one is forcing them to interact with me. However, I cannot record another parties conversations without their consent (like two other people who are talking to each other and I am not a party to the conversation).
Here is the code
16-11-66 :: 16-11 :: Title 16 — Crimes and Offenses :: 2006 Georgia Code :: Georgia Code :: US Codes and Statutes :: US Law :: Justia