President Obama reverses abortion-funds policy

[shel90]

advanced technology? what you mean things are getting better than in old days? Are you supporting abortion with advanced technology? What does advanced technology have to do with abortion?

After thinking about it...she could mean surveillance..

 

[shel90]

There have been many intelligent pro lifers taking part for a long time now. But they must get sick of having the same old faulty arguments repeated at them so they seem to stop posting eventually.

But for some reason the pro abortion people keep comming back repeating the same old jargon.

As for sob stories. The pro abortion lot come up with quite a few. The whole stand is one major sob story if you ask me:

Poor little ladies being deprived the right to murder their babies Oh boo hoo! boo hoo!

Pro-choicers do not push for abortions...it is about each individual having the right to make the choices for themselves. We dont believe in imposing our values or beliefs on other people especially when it is something so personal and private.

 

[dreama]

Then mothers are forced to carry their babies to term, keep them but end up abusing them, or killing them hence more death and destruction.

Nope. Abusers actually WANT babies so they can abuse them later on. They are happy to have abortion legal though as it makes it nice and convenient for when their daughter becomes pregnant and they don't want any awkward questions to be asked.

either way, nobody wins but the whole point is in this country, every woman has a constistutional right to do whatever medical procedure she wants and nobody else has the right to impose their values and beliefs on them.

That's nice to know. Do women who want a leg removed have the same right?

Of course I'm all for a woman having a right to do what she wants with her own body but the baby is not part of her body. The baby has a body of her own.

 

[shel90]

Nope. Abusers actually WANT babies so they can abuse them later on. They are happy to have abortion legal though as it makes it nice and convenient for when their daughter becomes pregnant and they don't want any awkward questions to be asked.



That's nice to know. Do women who want a leg removed have the same right?

Of course I'm all for a woman having a right to do what she wants with her own body but the baby is not part of her body. The baby has a body of her own.

That has been debated heavily in several other threads..

 

[Jiro]

"Does a woman have the right to privacy of the decision to do so?"

YES or NO?

 

[dreama]

"Does a woman have the right to privacy of the decision to do so?"

By that I take it you mean:

"Does a woman have the right to abort her baby?"

The answer to that is No. It Wasn't a difficult question to answer at all. But I suppose you are just not liking the answer.

Abortion is not always going to be legal you know.

 

[Dutch]

I believe Dutch IS participating in this thread. I'd like him stay since us pro lifers are usually so much outnumbered in these threads.

That seems to be another pattern of theirs(what you were responding to)

I find it amazing how they do not like(and I can see why) to discuss what is actually developing in the womb, but instead they resort to- we're talking about roe-v-wade..what you're talking about has nothing to do with the legality of abortion...you're talking morals and not the law..blah blah blah.

We're called "moral Nazis"..and what are the Nazis famous for? Killing innocent people. They did so because Hitler said it was ok- even ordered them to do so. It was the law of the land. What was that? Morals? Is that the reason why it was wrong? Chinese forced abortions. It's their law. Nothing wrong with it I guess? Don't you dare bring morals into that one, either

 

[shel90]

That seems to be another pattern of theirs(what you were responding to)

I find it amazing how they do not like(and I can see why) to discuss what is actually developing in the womb, but instead they resort to- we're talking about roe-v-wade..what you're talking about has nothing to do with the legality of abortion...you're talking morals and not the law..blah blah blah.

We're called "moral Nazis"..and what are the Nazis famous for? Killing innocent people. They did so because Hitler said it was ok- even ordered them to do so. It was the law of the land. What was that? Morals? Is that the reason why it was wrong? Chinese forced abortions. It's their law. Nothing wrong with it I guess? Don't you dare bring morals into that one, either

Your morals isnt everyone else's morals just like mine arent. That's why we are all individuals...

 

[Jiro]

By that I take it you mean:

"Does a woman have the right to abort her baby?"

The answer to that is No. It Wasn't a difficult question to answer at all. But I suppose you are just not liking the answer.

Abortion is not always going to be legal you know.

sorry but that wasn't the question in Roe v. Wade case. The question was asked by Supreme Court that determined the legalization of abortion. So I ask again -

"Does a woman have the right to privacy of the decision to do so?" YES or NO?

 

[Maria]

"Does a woman have the right to privacy of the decision to do so?"

YES or NO?

IF, I am just pressin' IF, that Constitution give a woman right to privacy, then the Constitution give me a right to the 5th Amendment as well.

 

[Dutch]

but it's the truth. nice try to troll. I kindly ask you to participate with something pertinent to this thread.

Forum Rules

3..) NO TROLLING. A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting outrageous messages, and usually ends with name callings and flame wars.

Here's a mirror for you, Jiro. What was that about moral Nazis?

 

[Jiro]

3..) NO TROLLING. A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting outrageous messages, and usually ends with name callings and flame wars.

Here's a mirror for you, Jiro. What was that about moral Nazis?

You have been reported to mod. Adios!

 

[Hear Again]

Nah, I highly doubt it. It is not gonna happen in the near future.

so you mean to tell me that in the future things will change and mothers won't kill their unborn children? perhaps in a utopia, but not IRL.

 

[Jiro]

IF, I am just pressin' IF, that Constitution give a woman right to privacy, then the Constitution give me a right to the 5th Amendment as well.

Since you pleaded your 5th, you no longer can voice your opinions in this thread anymore. You just disappointed your own pro-lifers Adios!

 

[Dutch]

Your morals isnt everyone else's morals just like mine arent. That's why we are all individuals...

Well, you got that right at least. Let's stop the whining about morals then. Because I will continue to bring up the examples I gave otherwise.

 

[shel90]

3..) NO TROLLING. A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting outrageous messages, and usually ends with name callings and flame wars.

Here's a mirror for you, Jiro. What was that about moral Nazis?

If u want to start a thread about the use of this word, "Nazis" by all means, go for it.

 

[Hear Again]

Well, you got that right at least. Let's stop the whining about morals then. Because I will continue to bring up the examples I gave otherwise.

ummm...you're the one who started complaining about morals when you brought up jillio.

 

[Dutch]

You have been reported to mod. Adios!

And you were some time ago. Let's see if there's a double standard.

 

[shel90]

IF, I am just pressin' IF, that Constitution give a woman right to privacy, then the Constitution give me a right to the 5th Amendment as well.

You arent a witness to court here on AD. Guess u cant answer the question...

 

[Jiro]

And you were some time ago. Let's see if there's a double standard.

difference is - my posts are 100% pertinent to this thread. yours are not.