True but it is much more deserving for him to have life and be in the general population to be beat and tortured for the rest of his life. An injection is too easy for him.Levonian said:It doesn’t really matter if he gets the death penalty or not, because in California, the death penalty and life without parole are essentially the same thing. It takes forever to execute somebody in California. The most recent person to executed in California was on death row for more than 20 years. So Peterson will probably be somewhere near retirement age before they fry him. The nice thing about the death penalty though, is that prisoners on death row spend 23 out of every 24 hours in cell with a 5’ X 7’ floor space—just slightly larger than a sheet of plywood. Measure out a 5’ X 7’ area on the floor and you’ll see how small that is. In my opinion, that’s almost as good as the death penalty, and in some ways is even better.
Levonian said:It doesn’t really matter if he gets the death penalty or not, because in California, the death penalty and life without parole are essentially the same thing. It takes forever to execute somebody in California. The most recent person to executed in California was on death row for more than 20 years. So Peterson will probably be somewhere near retirement age before they fry him. The nice thing about the death penalty though, is that prisoners on death row spend 23 out of every 24 hours in cell with a 5’ X 7’ floor space—just slightly larger than a sheet of plywood. Measure out a 5’ X 7’ area on the floor and you’ll see how small that is. In my opinion, that’s almost as good as the death penalty, and in some ways is even better.
Miss*Pinocchio said:Scott Peterson doesn't care. He came in the court laughing and smiling
today. And show no emotional or remorse during the court.
That is awful.
Yeah thats true, thats what pisses me off, he wont ever get executed for a very long time, he could be dead from old age before he get executed..geez!Levonian said:It doesn’t really matter if he gets the death penalty or not, because in California, the death penalty and life without parole are essentially the same thing. It takes forever to execute somebody in California. The most recent person to executed in California was on death row for more than 20 years. So Peterson will probably be somewhere near retirement age before they fry him. The nice thing about the death penalty though, is that prisoners on death row spend 23 out of every 24 hours in cell with a 5’ X 7’ floor space—just slightly larger than a sheet of plywood. Measure out a 5’ X 7’ area on the floor and you’ll see how small that is. In my opinion, that’s almost as good as the death penalty, and in some ways is even better.
Tousi said:An injection's the easy way out.
Cheri said:It would be nice to give them the same treatment the way they killed someone, Just like Scott should be in the ocean the same way Laci and Connor were, So he can get the idea of how that would feel. Too bad justice don't work that way. Maybe someone can bring that idea to the Congress. Yes, call me crazy.
And to make matters worse, if a defendant is convicted but not sentence to death, the state will still have to pay the price of life imprisonment, in addition to the increased trial expenses. In Florida, each execution costs the state $3.2 million. In California, it was reported that the state could save $90 millions a year if it abolished the death penalty. The New York Department of Correctional Services estimated that implementing the death penalty would cost the state about $118 million annually. The money that would be spent to implement the death penalty in New York for five years could fund 250 additional police officers and build prisons for 6000 inmates. The costly effect of the death penalty reach farther than the pockets of the taxpayers. The American Bar Association found that the justice system in many parts of the United States is on the verge of collapsing due to inadequate funding. New Jersey, for example, laid off more than 500 police officers in 1991; during the same period of time, New Jersey was also implementing the death penalty, which cost them $16 million per year. Florida, on the other hand, had a $45 million budget cut from the Department of Corrections, which forced it to release 3,000 inmates early. Moreover, Florida was another state spending millions of dollars on the death penalty. The Sierra County District Attorney, James Reichle, was quoted saying, If we didn't have to pay $50,000 a pop for Sacramento's murders, I'd have an investigator and the sheriff would have a couple of extra deputies and we could do some lasting good for Sierra county law enforcement. In Texas, the early release of prisoners has meant that inmates are serving only twenty percent of their sentences. So this great weapon we call the death penalty is in actuality taking police officers off the streets, while putting convicted criminals back on the street and all at the tax payers expense. Knowing that the death penalty is cost inefficient, the opposition believes that we should increase its efficiency by limiting the appeal process and not abolish it all together
yea i agree with u... i hate to see death!!Liebling:-))) said:I am not for death penatly.
I rather to see him suffer in prision to life sentence than put him "sleep" .
Liebling...I respect that you dont believe in death penalty but what aboutLiebling:-))) said:I am not for death penatly.
I rather to see him suffer in prision to life sentence than put him "sleep" .