Like I said before, both parties are guilty!
There doesn't need to be any profanity. If you say it is wrong for this man to expose people to HIV which could kill them then it is equally wrong for the judicial system to put this man to death. This is why we do not requite evil for evil.
Like I said before, both parties are guilty!
There doesn't need to be any profanity. If you say it is wrong for this man to expose people to HIV which could kill them then it is equally wrong for the judicial system to put this man to death. This is why we do not requite evil for evil.
If you believe that, then what should be done to them?
Like I said before, both parties are guilty!
No comparison, whatsoever.There doesn't need to be any profanity. If you say it is wrong for this man to expose people to HIV which could kill them then it is equally wrong for the judicial system to put this man to death. This is why we do not requite evil for evil.
but...evil is not to be tolerated which is why we have a system...a flaw one though....
You say it your way I say it mine. So, putting him in prison to spread the disease rather than removing him is just fine? This isn't star wars dude.:roll:
If you believe that, then what should be done to them?
In the eyes of the law (we are a nation of laws), the only one who can be prosecuted is the one who knowingly exposed his sexual partners to a deadly disease.
No comparison, whatsoever.
The man committed a felony action on people who had no knowledge of his HIV status. I don't argue that what the victims did was wise or right but in this case it wasn't illegal. He knowingly broke the law. If he is found guilty thru due process, then he has to pay the penalty.
Carrying out due process of our laws, as established by our Constitution, is not "evil" barring any corruption of the process by participants.
IMO, there were many flaws in the past (especially before JFK became the US President). In those times, Blacks were not treated equally, gay people hid in the closet and such. Today it's getting better than before. Example: Legalize gay marriage, more equality rights for minorities, women and people with disabilities, etc. Who create flaws currently? Republicans, of course.respectyoda;2235659[COLOR=Green said:There's so many flaws with the US Constitution and other laws government on the national, state, and local levels have enacted. For instance, the US Constitution allows for the freedom of speech which is otherwise known as the First Amendment, however, there had to be an addendum barring people from saying "Fire" in a movie theater! Another obvious flaw is stating that the US Government will not enforce a certain religion and this was created because the founding fathers were in a country where the King & Queen enforced a religion. Although many people like this law, it has only created and spread confusion across the country. Of course, confusion is not a good thing! [/COLOR]
IMO, there were many flaws in the past (especially before JFK became the US President). In those times, Blacks were not treated equally, gay people hid in the closet and such. Today it's getting better than before. Example: Legalize gay marriage, more equality rights for minorities, women and people with disabilities, etc. Who create flaws currently? Republicans, of course.
IMO, there were many flaws in the past (especially before JFK became the US President). In those times, Blacks were not treated equally, gay people hid in the closet and such. Today it's getting better than before. Example: Legalize gay marriage, more equality rights for minorities, women and people with disabilities, etc. Who create flaws currently? Republicans, of course.
Oh, did you read my reply at GLBT Lounge?Most republicans support disability rights, but some do support gay marriage.
Based on my belief, gay marriage is acceptable, also I'm not Christian.
No, our justice system is not "full of flaws." Not being perfect is not the same as being "full of flaws."Yes, the human based judicial system has always been full of flaws. This is because man has the tendency to lean to their own understanding and as a result, make many erroneous judgments.
We should but we don't. Therefore, we need laws, which include penalties when they're broken. We do have power delegated to us to carry out our laws.Putting this man in prison for his crime is appropriate because he is to be separated from the general population. Putting him to death, however, is not appropriate. This is because we all are human beings. We do not have power over our fellow human beings and our fellow human beings do not have power over us either. We all should coexist together in peace. We are the only species that kill each other!
If they don't have a Mediator.These unfortunate people who possibly have contracted HIV/AIDS may not be judged by the US government in a court of law, but they nonetheless will be judged for their actions.
I think you better study the Constitution more deeply before you make such pronouncements, if you don't want to look foolish (although that is your First Amendment right). Especially look for "addendum." :roll:There's so many flaws with the US Constitution and other laws government on the national, state, and local levels have enacted. For instance, the US Constitution allows for the freedom of speech which is otherwise known as the First Amendment, however, there had to be an addendum barring people from saying "Fire" in a movie theater! Another obvious flaw is stating that the US Government will not enforce a certain religion and this was created because the founding fathers were in a country where the King & Queen enforced a religion. Although many people like this law, it has only created and spread confusion across the country. Of course, confusion is not a good thing!
We have an amendment process included in our Constitution, so it doesn't need updating.your consitution seem to me needs be brought up to date with rest of world.some of it crazy,my opinion and i know i get shot down for saying it
IMO, there were many flaws in the past (especially before JFK became the US President). In those times, Blacks were not treated equally, gay people hid in the closet and such. Today it's getting better than before. Example: Legalize gay marriage, more equality rights for minorities, women and people with disabilities, etc. Who create flaws currently? Republicans, of course.
Oh, did you read my reply at GLBT Lounge?
NJ governor is upset with the ruling by the state judge regarding gay marriage. The governor is a Republican. Nothing new!
Most republicans support disability rights, but some do support gay marriage.
Based on my belief, gay marriage is acceptable, also I'm not Christian.
No, our justice system is not "full of flaws." Not being perfect is not the same as being "full of flaws."
We should but we don't. Therefore, we need laws, which include penalties when they're broken. We do have power delegated to us to carry out our laws.