diehardbiker
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2004
- Messages
- 16,188
- Reaction score
- 16
No, how do you prove it isn't planted? Does not matter about attorney. The attorney job is to try to disprove evidences, and find any faults in investigation and prove.
Many, many convicts were found guilty EVEN though they really innocent. It is NOT the judge job to excuse any evidence they may deem unreliable. There were an article couple months ago that judges mentioned that they knew many were actually innocent but because law does not allow them to judge them out, in other word, its not their job.
I am not saying Wint is innocent, what I am saying is I wanted the justice work the way it should be. If Wint is truly innocent and there is somebody out there that is truly guilty SOB, there is no justice when Wint is found guilty and the real guilty one still on street... PERIOD, that is something I HATE so much. Guilty one free while innocent suffers... no! No justice!
Many, many convicts were found guilty EVEN though they really innocent. It is NOT the judge job to excuse any evidence they may deem unreliable. There were an article couple months ago that judges mentioned that they knew many were actually innocent but because law does not allow them to judge them out, in other word, its not their job.
I am not saying Wint is innocent, what I am saying is I wanted the justice work the way it should be. If Wint is truly innocent and there is somebody out there that is truly guilty SOB, there is no justice when Wint is found guilty and the real guilty one still on street... PERIOD, that is something I HATE so much. Guilty one free while innocent suffers... no! No justice!
If Wint's defendant lawyer says it like that, s/he must prove it so how would this lawyer do that?
Lastly, a lot of criminals don't think of consequences like DNA on a pizza crust. Mostly they make mistakes which lead to their arrests. Nothing new.