Paper apologizes, to some, over Obama cartoon

Status
Not open for further replies.

Liebling:-)))

Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
31,020
Reaction score
10
Paper apologizes, to some, over Obama cartoon

New York Post says the image was exploited by longtime antagonists


NEW YORK - The New York Post is apologizing for a cartoon that critics say links President Barack Obama to a raging chimpanzee shot dead by police in Connecticut. But the newspaper also says the image was exploited by its longtime antagonists.

After two days of protests, the paper posted an editorial on its Web site Thursday saying the cartoon was meant to mock the federal economic stimulus bill, but "to those who were offended by the image, we apologize."

The editorial also says some people who have long-standing differences with the paper saw the cartoon "as an opportunity for payback."

The editorial calls them "opportunists" and says: "To them, no apology is due."

The drawing was published Wednesday. It shows a dead chimp, with the caption reading: "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

Demonstrations outside paper
Earlier in the day, hundreds of demonstrators rallied to boycott the paper, branding it as racist.

Demonstrators led by civil rights activist Al Sharpton chanted "End racism now!" outside the parent company's skyscraper in midtown Manhattan and called for the jailing of Rupert Murdoch, whose international media conglomerate News Corp owns the Post.

The newspaper had defended the cartoon as a parody of Washington politics, but Sharpton said it exploited a potent image in the history of racism toward blacks.

The cartoon shows police shooting an ape and plays on the real shooting of a pet chimpanzee that went on a rampage in Connecticut this week.

One of the police officers says, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

Because Obama promoted the $787 billion economic stimulus that he signed into law on Tuesday, critics of the cartoon interpreted the dead chimp as a reference to Obama, who became the first black U.S. president on January 20

"I guess they thought we were chimpanzees," Sharpton said. "They will find out we are lions."

"You would have to be in a time warp or in a whole other world not to know what that means," said demonstrator Charles Ashley, 25, a model who did not believe the cartoon was an innocent political joke.

Others said it made light of assassinating Obama, a possibility they said that worries many African-Americans.

"Just the fact that they put a monkey with gunshot wounds in his chest, it gives the idea of an assassination," said Peter Aviles, 48, a building superintendent.

Police in Stamford, Connecticut, shot and killed a 200-pound chimpanzee on Monday after the pet nearly killed its owner's friend and attacked a police car. The chimp, named Travis, had once starred in television commercials and was taking medication for Lyme disease.

Paper apologizes, to some, over Obama cartoon - Politics- msnbc.com






 
I hope those people don't bring about the black people from the past (history). :eek3:
 
They apologized but still defended the photo.

So I really don't see it being an apology.
 
Denying wrong doing, and then making a selective "apology"? Sorry, not acceptable.
 
Seems too late to accept the apology...they already published it and been printed on thousands of newspapers state wide. I guess they just didnt care or show any respect of black people or the chimpanzee that went out of ramage earlier this week...making a mockery to the wildlife thinking all chimps are "evil" or whatever like that. :roll:
 
Seems too late to accept the apology...they already published it and been printed on thousands of newspapers state wide. I guess they just didnt care or show any respect of black people or the chimpanzee that went out of ramage earlier this week...making a mockery to the wildlife thinking all chimps are "evil" or whatever like that. :roll:

Not to mention making a mockery of the poor woman who was attacked and suffered such severe injuries.
 
Yes I agree that it´s not proper apology.
 
The editorial calls them "opportunists" and says: "To them, no apology is due."

What do you call it? If they really wanted to make a sincere apology - They should have been straightforward.

It seems like this apology is jaded and vague, obviously.
 
Good Lord!

Howdy DU members.....

Lets try some facts.

The cartoon was about the monkey (a pet) who went wild and attacked.
Politically the monkey would be Pelousy - since she wrote the Non-Stimulus (aka Porkulus) bill.

The NAACP is making a big deal of it to further their agenda.
The most racist folks in America are the agenda driven blacks.

This thread is as bad as the false "Palin owes taxes" thread that closed quickly.
 
Good Lord!

Howdy DU members.....

Lets try some facts.

The cartoon was about the monkey (a pet) who went wild and attacked.
Politically the monkey would be Pelousy - since she wrote the Non-Stimulus (aka Porkulus) bill.

The NAACP is making a big deal of it to further their agenda.
The most racist folks in America are the agenda driven blacks.

This thread is as bad as the false "Palin owes taxes" thread that closed quickly.

Who signed the bill? Obama.
 
Who signed the bill? Obama.
The cartoon didn't refer to the signer of the bill. It said, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

It actually brought to mind this well-known "theory" that's been around for years:

Parable of the Monkeys
 
The general consensus is that the cartoon was racially offensive, the catoonist suffered from a lapse in good judgement in even attempting to link two such unrelated events, the publisher suffered a lapse in good judgement in allowing the cartoon to be published, and as a result, a grave disservice was done on several levels.
 
The cartoon didn't refer to the signer of the bill. It said, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

It actually brought to mind this well-known "theory" that's been around for years:

Parable of the Monkeys

It didn't have to refer to the signer of the bill. Bottom line--who signed the bill?

A black man by the name of Obama did.
 
The person who published it should have been fired.

Keep in mind, this is the same paper that had "A-HOLE" all over it in reference to A-Rod of the Yankees. They obviously have low editorial standards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top