Palin getting divorced!

deafskeptic said:
I've spent a lot more time than I like defending Obama and I'm neutral on the guy.
Click to expand...
My feelings exactly. I never said I was an Obama hard core. It will be a long 41 months for these haters. I get tired of someone that keeps beating the same negative drums. What is gained?
 
saywhatkid said:
I am not attacking Palin. I know the story is false. I feel compelled to defend anyone under your constant assault.

The reason I post is because I am entitled to voice my OPINION. It is not the lone territory of hard core political observers. I feel like saying something, I will go ahead and post. Kind of adds a balance to the opposing views. I just don't have time to quote and reply with links and graphs to back up my OPINIONS. I form them and thats all it is. I am not campaigning for a candidate. I am not saying everything is great. I am saying, what's the point of your constant complaining? Why not just learn to relax and try to get along, instead of constantly beating down what is happening? Finding every angle possible to attack Obama? You are not an idiot. You seem well educated. Why not offer your skills to make the world a better place, instead of criticizing the way things are?

It doesn't matter, does it? You have chosen this road. You find glee in ripping anyone that disagrees with you; posting your hatred; researching your replies. A well oiled political machine, that is how you want to be viewed. That is what makes you feel good about yourself. So be it. I will reply here, then somewhere else. I will not hit "refresh" on the AD spy feature, hoping another "fool" falls into the web. But you have certainly gotten my attention, and I enjoy that.

And now, I will check the baseball scores.....​
Click to expand...

Um, when I said why the continued attacking I meant the mainstreamed media. :cool2:
 
deafskeptic said:
:
If Koko keeps going on like this, I'm betting many will have him on ignore and will not take him seriously on anything if his posts are any example.
Click to expand...
Yeah? I've always had a passion for politics. Not...gonna...change. So, you might as well save yourself the trouble then. *shrugs*
 
saywhatkid said:
Why not just learn to relax and try to get along, instead of constantly beating down what is happening? Finding every angle possible to attack Obama? You are not an idiot. You seem well educated. Why not offer your skills to make the world a better place, instead of criticizing the way things are?

It doesn't matter, does it? You have chosen this road. You find glee in ripping anyone that disagrees with you; posting your hatred; researching your replies. A well oiled political machine, that is how you want to be viewed. That is what makes you feel good about yourself. So be it. I will reply here, then somewhere else. I will not hit "refresh" on the AD spy feature, hoping another "fool" falls into the web. But you have certainly gotten my attention, and I enjoy that.

And now, I will check the baseball scores.....​
Click to expand...

Let me make myself clear to you. I am for lower taxes, limited government, capitalism, regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility and accountability. What Obama is doing is entirely the opposite in everything I (and many others) believe and support in. No big mystery why I didn't vote for him knowing that he wasn't even qualified and one of the most liberal senators around at the time. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that money you don't have doesn't mean you go ahead and create more deficit spending with a running deficit of $1.8 trillion dollars. It doesn't mean that you go ahead and expand the govt and programs. It doesn't mean you go ahead and go for a universal socialized medical health care if there's no money to help pay for. And if you actually take the time to do the research you'll find out that even taxing 100% of the rich won't even make a difference. But to believe that borrowing more money, expanding govt programs and seeing that the govt is actually getting bigger when there is no money to be had (other than just printing money which will only cause more inflation) is the answer then the person is the bigger fool and idiot. No different than believing that maxing out 10 of your credit cards is the answer to your huge debt to cover your own daily expenses. Both examples are for fools to believe in. Now, next time, instead of attacking the person perhaps you could actually just debate, make your arguments or case, or opinions on the subject the next time around? Hmmm..?:hmm:
 
"I am for lower taxes, limited government, capitalism, regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility and accountability. What Obama is doing is entirely the opposite in everything I (and many others) believe and support in. "

So, explain to us how lowering taxes will help our economy when we really depend on taxes for everything from education to transportation?

We are more capitalisitic than ever. FDR taxed the rich as much as 90% but it paid off well. With those taxes, we built interstate highways and a lot more.

Limited government? You're opposed to abortion and gay marriage? So, that's really asking the government to limit individual freedom.

Regulation of business? I thought you want businesses totally unregulated.

Strong national defense? We are a strong national defense.

Individual financial responsiblity and accountability? Sure, we want them but it won't happen unless the collective takes responsiblity too. It always takes two to tango! Banks got into the mess with us and you think it's entirely our fault? I am so disgusted with ridiculous loan and credit offers in mail from national banks, even from who were about to go bankrupt!
 
netrox said:
"I am for lower taxes, limited government, capitalism, regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility and accountability. What Obama is doing is entirely the opposite in everything I (and many others) believe and support in. "

So, explain to us how lowering taxes will help our economy when we really depend on taxes for everything from education to transportation? Koko - raising taxes has a stiffling effect. Quite simple. Reduce the tax rates on the highest-income earners and the government gets more money from them. Yet, when you cut tax rates on the middle and lower income earners, the government gets less money from them. Guess who will be taxed heavily next? Yup. Middle class income earners.

We are more capitalisitic than ever. FDR taxed the rich as much as 90% but it paid off well. With those taxes, we built interstate highways and a lot more. Koko - not really. It actually prolonged the depression. More taxes on businesses mean less capital to help create jobs.

Limited government? You're opposed to abortion and gay marriage? So, that's really asking the government to limit individual freedom. Koko - I believe in Federalism. But to have the Federal govt as your nanny isn't the answer which is already limiting your freedom.

Regulation of business? I thought you want businesses totally unregulated. Koko - the key is the proper regulation, not a bunch of red tape.

Strong national defense? We are a strong national defense. Koko - nah. Not really. Almost half of Obama’s budget cuts are to defense. And it'll get worse each year.

Individual financial responsiblity and accountability? Sure, we want them but it won't happen unless the collective takes responsiblity too. It always takes two to tango! Banks got into the mess with us and you think it's entirely our fault? Koko - look no further than Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I am so disgusted with ridiculous loan and credit offers in mail from national banks, even from who were about to go bankrupt!
Click to expand...


My comments are in red.
 
I think it has to do with " media malpractice " in between Obama and Palin. Media said crap things about her which are not true. And, it don't leave her children alone. IMO

I don't think she is gettin' divorce. Her and her husband are very much in love. :)
 
Where is this ignore feature of which you speak?
 
I was thinking...

People here say it is a rumor and that the reporting is not from areliable source. I was thinking in the past about how these tabloids reported prospect divorces of famous people and how people disregarded them as rumor BUT most of the time, the rumors have came true. Remmy all those rumors about Jessica Simpson and Nick, Tom and Nicole, and so on?

I wouldn't be so quick to dispel them..wait and see and if nothing then, they were definitely false. However, I do wish Palin and her hubby all the best if they are actually having marriage problems.
 
kokonut said:
Let me make myself clear to you. I am for lower taxes, limited government, capitalism, regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility and accountability. What Obama is doing is entirely the opposite in everything I (and many others) believe and support in. No big mystery why I didn't vote for him knowing that he wasn't even qualified and one of the most liberal senators around at the time. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that money you don't have doesn't mean you go ahead and create more deficit spending with a running deficit of $1.8 trillion dollars. It doesn't mean that you go ahead and expand the govt and programs. It doesn't mean you go ahead and go for a universal socialized medical health care if there's no money to help pay for. And if you actually take the time to do the research you'll find out that even taxing 100% of the rich won't even make a difference. But to believe that borrowing more money, expanding govt programs and seeing that the govt is actually getting bigger when there is no money to be had (other than just printing money which will only cause more inflation) is the answer then the person is the bigger fool and idiot. No different than believing that maxing out 10 of your credit cards is the answer to your huge debt to cover your own daily expenses. Both examples are for fools to believe in. Now, next time, instead of attacking the person perhaps you could actually just debate, make your arguments or case, or opinions on the subject the next time around? Hmmm..?:hmm:
Click to expand...
Why? You don't really listen to anyone, you just get out the red pen and your graphs. No thanks. Thing is, I really don't care what you think. Make sense? When it's time to vote, we will cancel each other out.
 
saywhatkid said:
Why? You don't really listen to anyone, you just get out the red pen and your graphs. No thanks. Thing is, I really don't care what you think. Make sense? When it's time to vote, we will cancel each other out.
Click to expand...

Then there is no need to reply. Eh? You're one of the most vocal on complaining about what I write or say. Just do read or don't bother to respond my post. Simple. Do I complain about what you write or whether I state out loud that I don't care what you think? No. I state my opinions. Whether you agree or not is up to you. Complaining ain't gonna help when you're trying to target me.
 
Back
Top