LuciaDisturbed
New Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2006
- Messages
- 7,718
- Reaction score
- 3
In my opinion, I think the school year should go year-round. There are way too many vacation days during the school year as it is.
It's funny that the kids in the USA are taught to respect other cultures, especially when those people come to the USA. They don't respect us, but we have to respect them. Go figure.
I don't see a problem with keeping the days off the same, but the sports programs need to be tightened, if not eliminated. If kids want sports, there are community centers all across the nation that offer these. Schools are for educating, not for sports.
Teachers have too many problem students in classrooms. I would favor the Socratical method of teaching to weed those students who want to be there from those who are wasting everyone's time.
Teachers also need to focus on teaching children, not on being "teachers." Big difference!
And get rid of those damn unions that want to "protect" lousy teachers!
There is a reason schools have sports practice, activites, and games AFTER SCHOOL..so that it doesn't occur during the school day. Therefore, what you said about schools being for educating only is moot.
I would not like it if there is nothing fun in class to do. Education should be fun, otherwise children will end up bored and not challenged and end up with no creativity. You can still educate and have fun while educating. It seems that children do better when their learning process is fun, not boring. If they enjoy learning they are more likely to get more involved in their own education, more likely to focus, etc. If they are bored they will tune out everything that is being taught.
And I would not give up on the students who are "troublemakers" or "wasting their time". There are many reasons some kids have behavioral problems or act up in class or just have no interest on what is being taught in class. Sometimes it is due to the bad home environment, other reasons could be psychiatric/psychological, or it could be due to a learning disability that the student is trying to cover up because they are embarrassed (such as a student who has dyslexia but is very embarrassed that he or she can't read so he or she ends up being the class clown so that the other students will not notice that he or she can't read because they are too entertained by that student - that student is afraid of being teased or bullied). I would not "weed out" the "good students" from those who are "wasting their time". If a kid is acting up in school or have no interest in what is being taught, there is usually a very significant reason. I was one of those students who acted up or otherwise had no interest in what was being taught in class. Guess what my reason was? I was being ABUSED at home by my dad's wife. I was frequently beaten up. Want to hear a story about the day she pinned me down on the kitchen floor and bashed my face with her fists? Or the weekend she ran a very very hot bath, forced me into the bath, and then took my head and bashed it down on the bottom of the bathtub which resulted in a nosebleed? Or the morning she woke me up for school by giving me a nosebleed? Let me know and I will PM you.
And, yes, I just read up on the Socratic Method as I have never heard of it up until now, and while that is interesting, the website that I just read about it from, it mentioned that three students still had no interest. It would still not be fair to "weed" out those students. You make it sound like those students who are "wasting time" are useless and should be kicked out. Why not get to the root of the problem instead of just kicking them out of class or school? If you got to the root of the problem of the non-interested/time waster student, then you will be able to get that student more interested in what is being taught once you get to the root of his or her problem and have worked on that problem with that student. If I were a teacher in that class with the 3 students I would never give up on those three students. To give up on those student is to condemn them to a dismal future. Is that fair?