The NCLB act is all about accountability to our children and to ensure competitiveness on the global stage, especially in math and the sciences. Whether the NCLB act misses its mark or has failed our children is a matter of interpretation.
I do have some concerns as far as the DHH population is concerned. I, for one, love the idea of accountability in an era of reduced expectations for DHH students. But, at what price? Let's see;
DHH students, generally speaking, are not able to pass their state-mandated exams and have to rely on the generosity of their schools, or state law loopholes, in order to get their H.S. diplomas. I'm still not sold on this, as I want DHH students to be more proficient in areas of English and Math, but if it results in a mass disenfranchisement of an entire DHH generation, I don't think that's a good thing either.
DHH teachers may not be able to get jobs as Teachers of the Deaf, because the NCLB act requires certification and that means taking up exams. I'm somewhat ambivalent, as I want highly qualified DHH teachers, but hate to see some DHH teachers lose their jobs or not being able to enter the teaching market because of this. It's a moot point for me, as I already passed the Florida exam, and I still haven't been able to crack the Teacher of the Deaf job market.
Lastly, what happens to a Deaf school that has unsatisfactory performance in their statewide testing regimen? I read this blog on DeafDC about Maryland School of the Deaf wanting to have hearing students to boost their statewide testing scores.
Will the state Department of Education take over a failing Deaf school? If that were the case, sadly, nearly all Deaf schools (except MSD & MSSD) would be considered failures and ripe for takeover by people who know nothing about Deaf education. Now, that would be a tragic result of the NCLB act.