Is it passable??
Kinda wanted to add my 2 cents about the NIC being passable...take a look in the VIEWS...people ARE passing. Many factors go into the pass/fail aspect though. Test anxiety, pressure to perform (for well-known and well-respected terps), personal factors (death in the family, divorce, etc.), being ILL PREPARED (for those who have been terping for some time and feel that this is just another test), and many more. I find that many terps fail to accept responsibility for how poorly they do on the test and find it easier to just blame the test. That makes no sense to me. Raters are monitored to be within the normal range of the other raters. If three raters give someone a LOW on some areas, chances are the person didn't do as well as s/he expected. This is a psychometrically valid and constantly monitored exam. I find it disheartening that terps will invalidate the test (and in turn, those who passed) rather than just doing some self-inventory. Any thoughts on that?
Kinda wanted to add my 2 cents about the NIC being passable...take a look in the VIEWS...people ARE passing. Many factors go into the pass/fail aspect though. Test anxiety, pressure to perform (for well-known and well-respected terps), personal factors (death in the family, divorce, etc.), being ILL PREPARED (for those who have been terping for some time and feel that this is just another test), and many more. I find that many terps fail to accept responsibility for how poorly they do on the test and find it easier to just blame the test. That makes no sense to me. Raters are monitored to be within the normal range of the other raters. If three raters give someone a LOW on some areas, chances are the person didn't do as well as s/he expected. This is a psychometrically valid and constantly monitored exam. I find it disheartening that terps will invalidate the test (and in turn, those who passed) rather than just doing some self-inventory. Any thoughts on that?