That's not the situation here in South Carolina, especially in the Lowcountry area. The more "local" a politician sounds, the better are his or her chances of being elected. That includes black politicians who speak with a thick "Eastside-Charleston" accent. We have politicians in this area that would probably be almost incomprehensible to people outside this area. They get re-elected, year after year.It wouldn't disqualify anyone but it would sure make it harder for them to run for office.
Anyone with a non-standard dialect has a harder time when running for office. Look at Sarah Palin. She was white but she had a non-standard dialect which caused people to question her intelligence more readily than they would if she had a standard dialect.
Enter race. It's a fact that racism runs rampant, even if it's more subtle nowadays than it was back in the lynching days.
Now where dialects and race meet. There are certain dialects of English that most people associate with African-Americans. It doesn't matter who actually speaks what, if black people speak a dialect associated with their race or not, or if other races speak the same dialect, what matters is that the associations are there for many people.
So combine all these factors, and you get people questioning the intelligence of someone who speaks a dialect associated with black people, especially if the speaker happens to be black.
Why would that be a problem?
interesting... but I've heard black celebrities call themselves "negros." I see nothing wrong with the term. African-American is more offensive to me than "negro" because it implies that they rather be Africans first.
Local politicians are NOT the same as national politicians as each demands a different situation.
I wouldn't know. I just remember his fancy footwork on stage. It struck me a moving target is harder to hit than a still one.
How about a "deaf accent?"
That's not the situation here in South Carolina, especially in the Lowcountry area. The more "local" a politician sounds, the better are his or her chances of being elected. That includes black politicians who speak with a thick "Eastside-Charleston" accent. We have politicians in this area that would probably be almost incomprehensible to people outside this area. They get re-elected, year after year.
BTW, there is no such thing as a single "Negro dialect" in the USA.
You're absolutely right that the audience makes a big difference. I was speaking in terms of the national audience, i.e. for a presidential election.
I know there isn't any such thing as a single "Negro dialect." And I never said there was. I said that people associate a dialect or family of dialects with African-Americans. I happen to know many people who speak the dialects that are associated with black people that aren't black. And I know black people who speak all kinds of dialects. But that doesn't change the fact that the majority of people do have an association in their mind between black people and certain dialects. And factors like that play into the results of an election poll.
Wrong Jackson.
You mean Say what?