Bear,
I understand your venting, and I mostly agree with you. I realize that part of your accusation is directed towards me, and for a good reason. I have been very involved in the “discussion”.
I am hear from the viewpoint of a hearing parent with a deaf child that we choose to have CI. THAT is my point of view.
Thinking what I could have done different… I came up with plenty of posts where passion got the overhand. But nowhere do I feel that I have stepped outside the arena that was created. Harsh posts are easily replied with another harsh post, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
You say you notice that there is no respect for individual opinions. From my point of view, I do not agree with you. Overall people respect their opinions, and in general people agree to disagree.
There are a lot of threads with excellent information regarding deafness, HA’s and CI. People that come here will have no problems finding the correct information.
But topics do tend to go off-track with personal issues.
With me, my biggest problem is when someone is broadcasting misinformation. I am not talking about opinions. The opinion that “Toddlers should not be operated upon” is a good one. The opinion that “Toddlers should be operated upon as soon as possible” is fine. But broadcasts like “CI is the same as HA” when people that actually having used both have explained again and again that they are completely different; THAT is what I react against.
Members have explained patiently how the facts are. Created separate threads showing their experiences. Acknowledging that there are differences in experience.
I have see threads created regarding own – first-hand- experiences, regarding experience of other their children, about which books to read, about technical issues. But also threads showing misconception and plain predjudice.
The guest browsing through AllDeaf will see a lot of topics and will find information he/she needs. Especially in the first part of the topics, where the topic is still on track. All topics derail in time. One of the topics kept on going for 1400 posts, being off-topic for about 1350 of them.
Regarding your example below:
Bear said:
One person complains about wanting a CI taken out. Do I see others showing compassion to this person and saying gee I sympathize with you and support your decision no matter what? NO, I see them questioning if their reasons were truly the right reasons for removal? ……...
There was compassion, but people that know about CI found it a strange story. To someone that does not like CI, it could have looked as if there was no compassion, but the fact is; the story didn’t make sense. When information came in, it did not become clearer. In the end, due to reappearance at another time, more information became available that was not shared earlier.
So, to you there might be lack of compassion, to another there was a doubtful story where more information was requested.
But I agree that discussion should be done in a mature way. Also, people should perhaps react quicker when they see deviation from the topic, name-calling or other deviations from normal discussion rules. (That said.. I don’t mind sometimes a picture that sais more that 100 words.)
In that sense, I wouldn’t mind if non-related thing were removed when requested to the moderator.
I want to add to this that I feel that the moderators are doing a good job. In another messageboard I allway’s felt that any opinion opposite of that of the moderator/messageboard would be a cause of a malfunction of my posting-abilities. This would happen without warning, without explanation.
I never felt that way with AllDeaf. At all times I felt that I could state my opinion and confront people when I felt it was appropriate.
I comment AllDeaf for that.