Actually that's a bit inaccurate. Profound can mean anything from hearing 30% of speech words (unaided) on the spondee tests to absolutly NO response (even to enviromental sounds) with aids.
Definitly trial the aids. Don't panic. See if the aids work. You'll still have time for your daughter's listening abilty to develop. I know it may seem like all the docs adn experts make it seem like if a kid isn't aided/implanted optiminly the VERY SECOND they are dx with a hearing loss, they won't be able to acheive in life.
Many of us got our hearing aids as toddlers and we've done fine. The most important thing is Don't Panic.
They did the brainwave test under sedation. The max they could go to was 90db for an infant. 90db had no brainwave response at all. In a year they said they could go higher- above 100 and see what happens. I'm not sure where that puts her. Based on these results I guess its unclear whether hearing aides can help? Seemed to be their take home message for us.
Maybe the grief will hit one of these days. Right now I'm just in GO mode.
Thank you for the explanation of EI. Its something I will ask about when we visit the audiology dept next week.
Sigh...... Sorry, but a profound loss can range from the spondee test (which is the say the word test, NOT an open set test of two dissimlair words) to not even any benifit from aids at ALL. There are still people who wear HAs who have profound losses who get decent benifit from HAs. True, its rare for a deaf person to be able to function beyond one on one , with has but you could say that about hoh folks.I meant understand running speech and language, not pick out a few words when given very dissimilar choices. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Sigh. I'm not anti early amplifcation/intervention. Yes, some kids do REALLY well when amplfied early, but a lot of those kids have other things going for them. Oral sucess isn't dependant on ONE thing. It's a mix of many different things. (helicopter parents, parents with very good health insurance, access to quality therapy and so on)As for "no hurry" and "everything will be fine", you know we disagree. All the research shows that early id'ed kids with appropriate amplification and intervention do better than late identified kids.
Sigh...... Sorry, but a profound loss can range from the spondee test (which is the say the word test, NOT an open set test of two dissimlair words) to not even any benifit from aids at ALL. There are still people who wear HAs who have profound losses who get decent benifit from HAs. True, its rare for a deaf person to be able to function beyond one on one , with has but you could say that about hoh folks.
Sigh. I'm not anti early amplifcation/intervention. Yes, some kids do REALLY well when amplfied early, but a lot of those kids have other things going for them. Oral sucess isn't dependant on ONE thing. It's a mix of many different things. (helicopter parents, parents with very good health insurance, access to quality therapy and so on)
That could be an unaided score. Hearing aids could still help in that case. I know someone whose score on the spondee test was 10% (unaided) and aided, he could hear 65%.score 30% on this test you would not need open-set word recognition. You would not need to understand general speech, you would just need to be able to hear the difference between those very different words.