Beowulf, that was from a government report. Not that I trust the government any more than I trust BP.
The salty ocean itself naturally breaks down the oil, albeit even though this a single source of oil release in large amounts over time. The ocean bottom of the Gulf of Mexico releases 100,000 to 400,000 barrels of oil a year naturally. In this case, you won't have repercussions worldwide in terms of ecological disaster. It'd be much more limited. Just possibly at the local or regional level. Then you have hurricanes that can serve to break up the oil even faster. Now, oil on the beach, in the estuaries, etc is a different matter. Then you have the ocean's circulation to think about, too.
The sea's warm surface and oil-munching bacteria have dissipated the slick to such an extent that a planeload of journalists had to fly for an hour before their pilot could find a patch of oil. His relief, according to one reporter on board, was comparable to the anxious captain of a tourist boat spotting a distant pod of dolphins.
It turns out that the playful sea mammals, like other creatures, suffered much less damage than was forecast. A grand total of three dead dolphins covered in oil have been recovered by wildlife rescue teams. The spill has so far killed less than one per cent of the number of birds claimed by the Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska in 1989.
With the gush plugged for the past two weeks, experts are beginning to question whether the BP spill can really be called an environmental disaster at all.
Yeah, and add on the recent spill... could take two lifetimes before it's done. Unless, someone else spills oil within the next 20 years! :Ohno:the damage is still unknown. short-term - it looks ok. long-term? probably will show at later date.
let's not forget - the environment damaged by Exxon-Valdez oil spill is still seriously damaged.... since 1989.
the damage is still unknown. short-term - it looks ok. long-term? probably will show at later date.
let's not forget - the environment damaged by Exxon-Valdez oil spill is still seriously damaged.... since 1989.
And from today's article on what's left of the oil in the ocean.
BP's evaporating oil slick leaves America without a villain - Telegraph
It didn't say it was over. It said it was hard to find the slick out on the ocean.
The most prominent places to see the muddy brown oil slick are along the coastline, on the coast and in the estuaries. It'll be a while til it all breaks down naturally through weathering. These will be the most visible impacted areas. I suspect it'll be 3 or 4 years til fishing, shell and crab catching can resume in the impacted area of the ocean. Coastline and estuary are a different matter.
The Exxon Valdez's oil was the processed thick black oil that is still present today under the rocks and up to several inches below the surface along the impacted coast of Alaska. Just lift a rock and you can see some oil under it. Other than life has resumed in the waters off of Alaska.
How can oil be biodegradable? Oil kills wildlife.
Everything breaks down even oil. With oxygen it helps with the biodegradation process. Sure, oil can kill wildlife if there is enough of it. There are species on the bottom of the ocean seafloor that thrive on oil seeps and it actually help marine life.
all you have to do is put a wedding ring on it, that will keep the hole from putting out...
Everything breaks down even oil. With oxygen it helps with the biodegradation process. Sure, oil can kill wildlife if there is enough of it. There are species on the bottom of the ocean seafloor that thrive on oil seeps and it actually help marine life.
how about plastic?
how about plastic?