Most deaf childrens' parents never learn to sign

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
6
Most deaf childrens' parents never learn to sign - Stephen Roldan - The Olympian - Olympia, Washington

Last month, Seth, my 4-year-old, was watching me clean four, bright pink salmon. While relating the yarn of how I caught them, he had a puzzled look on his face and blurted out in a serious tone, "Dad, why aren’t pink salmon pink?"

I looked down at the fish and realized the kid was right. Chrome bright pink salmon aren’t pink. Quickly running inside, I retrieved a book about salmon. Showing Seth pictures and explaining what salmon look like when they spawn satisfied his insightful question and he returned to riding his bike.

At that moment, I remembered one young man I met at work. He was born deaf to hearing parents and was neglected as a child. All his formative years were spent in front of a TV. When he entered school, he had a vocabulary of 100 words.

As I spoke with him, it was clear he was an intelligent young man, but had no foundation on which to build his communication and reasoning skills. He couldn’t ask why pink salmon aren’t pink, or why the sky was blue, let alone comprehend the answer. Without the fundamental learning that hearing children obtain from home, he fell behind and will likely never catch up.

Sadly, this happens far too often.

Professionally, we refer to individuals like this as “low-functioning deaf.” Some low-functioning deaf individuals have other disabilities. However, without having learned how to communicate, deaf individuals who might normally succeed in life are at high risk to become low functioning.

Is there anything that we can do? I believe so, and the foundation begins with language acquisition.

William Stokoe, who pioneered the linguistic studies of American Sign Language once said, “Language isn’t mouth stuff, it’s brain stuff.”

Babies’ brains are programmed from day one to acquire a first language, signed or spoken. Since deaf children cannot hear, they naturally tune into visual cues and signed languages. Shockingly, studies reveal that 98 percent of all parents of deaf children never learn American Sign Language. Partly at fault are doctors and audiologists who insist to vulnerable parents that deaf children should learn to speak and discourage the use of American Sign Language. Only a small fraction of deaf children begin life in an environment where they can thrive and develop.

Regardless of language needs, most deaf kids are mainstreamed. While some manage to succeed, many struggle with the fundamentals of learning. For example, the average deaf student finishes high school reading at the fourth-grade level. Worse yet, many medical professionals and school systems cling to archaic methods that are unreliable and unrealistic. This is a residual effect from the greatest historical enemy of the deaf American – Alexander Graham Bell.

He insisted that the deaf be taught to speak instead of using the already successful sign language method. Through his efforts, American Sign Language was abolished from all schooling systems. He also advocated for strong social reforms such as making it illegal for the deaf to intermarry. As he put it, “Sign language causes the intermarriage of deaf-mutes and the propagation of their physical defect which creates a defective race of human beings.”

As Nazi as his ideas appear today, back in the 1800s, they were received warmly because of his reputation as a scientist. Unfortunately, the impact of these discriminatory policies and stereotyping has continued over one century.

Today, an increasing number of schools are incorporating American Sign Language and English to work in tandem, to broaden the learning opportunities for the deaf. Clearly, the roots to success begin at home and parents have the ultimate obligation to help their children prepare for school.

However, without further educational and medical reforms which focus on adequately meeting the needs of the deaf, how many do we risk leaving behind?

Stephen Roldan, a member of The Olympian’s Diversity Panel, is statewide coordinator of deaf services for the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. He can be reached at roldasj@dshs.wa.gov.
 
Regardless of language needs, most deaf kids are mainstreamed. While some manage to succeed, many struggle with the fundamentals of learning. For example, the average deaf student finishes high school reading at the fourth-grade level. Worse yet, many medical professionals and school systems cling to archaic methods that are unreliable and unrealistic. This is a residual effect from the greatest historical enemy of the deaf American – Alexander Graham Bell.

He insisted that the deaf be taught to speak instead of using the already successful sign language method. Through his efforts, American Sign Language was abolished from all schooling systems. He also advocated for strong social reforms such as making it illegal for the deaf to intermarry. As he put it, “Sign language causes the intermarriage of deaf-mutes and the propagation of their physical defect which creates a defective race of human beings.”


All the more reason to be against the oral-only philosophy. I will never support this BS.
 
At that moment, I remembered one young man I met at work. He was born deaf to hearing parents and was neglected as a child. All his formative years were spent in front of a TV. When he entered school, he had a vocabulary of 100 words.

As I spoke with him, it was clear he was an intelligent young man, but had no foundation on which to build his communication and reasoning skills. He couldn’t ask why pink salmon aren’t pink, or why the sky was blue, let alone comprehend the answer. Without the fundamental learning that hearing children obtain from home, he fell behind and will likely never catch up


Yep! So people need to stop blaming deaf schools. Seriously. This is the root of the problems with low reading levels.
 
Maybe someday we will see the second Golden Era of Deafness...

With CI ? I don't know as many doctors who implanted CI usually suggested that the child not to learn ASL. We'll have to change their minds.
 
Just musing... would be nice to see 1810s-1870s all over again...

Yeah. I'm speechless at Shel's post about a child with a vob of 100 at age six. I am so angry at this that I don't know how to respond to it.

I will never be for oralism only.
 
I will never be for oralism only.
Same here... but it's a sad fact for MANY deaf people... this is ONE of the reasons...
Babies’ brains are programmed from day one to acquire a first language, signed or spoken. Since deaf children cannot hear, they naturally tune into visual cues and signed languages. Shockingly, studies reveal that 98 percent of all parents of deaf children never learn American Sign Language. Partly at fault are doctors and audiologists who insist to vulnerable parents that deaf children should learn to speak and discourage the use of American Sign Language. Only a small fraction of deaf children begin life in an environment where they can thrive and develop.
Partially at fault is right and in my experience PRIDE is the other partial reason. The "there is NOTHING wrong with my child!" syndrome of hearing parents. Denial, embarrassment (being in public and signing with people looking on/staring), guilt, fear for the child growing up in a "hearing world" etc. etc.
Another partial reason is just plain ignorance on the parents part. Ignorance of the potential of a deaf child which is the same as any hearing child. That the learning curves are the same provided that language is introduced as soon as possible.
I'm against CI's for children because to my mind it's nothing more than mutilation of the body (head). Drilling holes in it and sticking wires and all that. It also cries out that because the child has a CI then there's no reason to learn signs. At least in the doctor's/audiologist's mind and eventually the parent's mind.
What is a blessing however is that there are a growing number of hearing parents who are willing to pick up signs and realizing that it does make communication between their child and them easier on the home life. That there is much enjoyment. What is hard for them is understanding that EVERYTHING must be signed... family gatherings and dinner-table conversations.
Education is needed. Not just on special television programs on discovery channel or where-ever, but also in films and other media. The more people know...
Our (ASL) language is probably one of the richest cultural aspects of who/what we are. To deny it to one born or even early/late deafened is a tragedy. Those I know who are losing their hearing but still haven't made the leap to acquiring hearing aids, I always advise them to start learning sign-language now or as soon as possible so that they won't be "left-behind" or "left-out", so that their transition from hearing to HH to Deaf worlds will be easier on them.
 
That is exactly what happen in the first OP here and I am very much against oralism in the mainstream school just like everyone here. :( I have been there and done that back in the 50's and 60's.

:gpost:
 
It's important not to blame parents, blame oralism or even blame A.G. Bell as well.

We need to focus on the system itself.

The system that started a long time ago before A.G. Bell. This system that already had pre-conceived notions and built-in attitudinal approaches towards Deaf Culture.

Attack the system first and analyse why the system repeats this same error over and over. Question the approaches and you will get answer.

For example, it's easy to see why a lot of Deaf people dislike A.G. Bell because of his approaches. Now look at A. G. Bell, he was a product of his era and genre. He had a lot of revolutionary theories you have to admit this. He had research only available to him at his era.

Take this era, a lot of revolutionary theories are a whole lot different from A.G. Bell's time.

Some appreciate A.G. Bell's theories, some don't. It's important to see the difference of the eras and genres too as well.
 
It's important not to blame parents, blame oralism or even blame A.G. Bell as well.

We need to focus on the system itself.

The system that started a long time ago before A.G. Bell. This system that already had pre-conceived notions and built-in attitudinal approaches towards Deaf Culture.

Attack the system first and analyse why the system repeats this same error over and over. Question the approaches and you will get answer.

For example, it's easy to see why a lot of Deaf people dislike A.G. Bell because of his approaches. Now look at A. G. Bell, he was a product of his era and genre. He had a lot of revolutionary theories you have to admit this. He had research only available to him at his era.

Take this era, a lot of revolutionary theories are a whole lot different from A.G. Bell's time.

Some appreciate A.G. Bell's theories, some don't. It's important to see the difference of the eras and genres too as well.

True, and I've no doubt of the genius of the man known as A.G. Bell. Without him we would've had no light, phones, etc. etc. (well, they would've arrived later than when they did... as Tesla was working on the light bulb at about the same time).
Bells theories and ideas are outdated and been found in many respects wrong. Attitudes of the late Victorian era have a lot of problems but in todays world where the young of our parents generation and the previous generation have been enlightened even further about deafness those old AG Bell ideas, values and standards are passe' and a lot of people know it.
I don't think we adhere to them as much as initially thought.
But I was not laying whole blame on the parents and doctors/audiologists... the blame also goes to the system which influences parents and doctors... but they still hold their share because they have educated themselves (or SHOULD have) about their patients/clients and children.

But as I said... the whole system is getting better little by little as strides in education, awareness and advocacy are getting better...little by little.

I agree with inmate23 btw on his statement:
i think people should not be able to get cis till they are 18
 
I agree that is it really crappy when parents don't do their jobs. Oral or sign, a parent with a Deaf child has a lot of work to do. If the parents decide they want the child to learn sign, but never learn themselves, the child will be in the exact same place as a child who parents decide that the child should be oral, and does nothing. It is your JOB as a parent to get language into your chhild, regardless of mode. So, I don't care if it is spoken language, ASL, SEE or Cued Speech, as long as it is working. Get language in there! (For the record, I prefer ASL and spoken language, for many reasons, but that isn't everyone's choice.)

As for CI's after 18. That has been discussed again and again, and the idea that that is a really option is a fallacy. It will not be as successful or useful if you wait. A parent must make the decsion, and if they don't give the CI, they are closing that door.
 
This is such a fustrating topic specially when your there witnessing it first hand. When you want to reach out to the family who seems not to care. Give 'em a good share to wake them up to how their lack of communication with a child is hurting them so badly. The situation I talk about is a 5yr old with no language skills! AHH, it kills me, the child has so much potential!! :|
 
This is such a fustrating topic specially when your there witnessing it first hand. When you want to reach out to the family who seems not to care. Give 'em a good share to wake them up to how their lack of communication with a child is hurting them so badly. The situation I talk about is a 5yr old with no language skills! AHH, it kills me, the child has so much potential!! :|

I was once a 5 year old with no language skills. Look at me now. That child has time to achieve.

And if you mean "shake" violence is not the answer. More likely they feel helpless, not indifferent.
 
Bottesini, as mentioned on another thread, you are very well-informed. Your writing is fantastic. You have a great sense of humor. You are one of the role models in the Deaf community. If more parents knew someone like you, they would be reassured that their deaf child can develop and learn at their own pace. In truth, ALL children develop and learn at their own pace.
 
Back
Top