- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 7
You might actually agree... in what?
You..... Your reasoning. though
You might actually agree... in what?
You..... Your reasoning. though
Then you would have no reason to get upset about a male principal paddling a female student.precisely my point!
If there is no sexual arousal happening (as you stated), then what is the basis for it not being appropriate?The basis of my concern isn't sexual arousal. it's simply not appropriate. period.
Then you would have no reason to get upset about a male principal paddling a female student.
If there is no sexual arousal happening (as you stated), then what is the basis for it not being appropriate?
how? you repeatedly stated that I'm not answering your question... so how can you "might" agree with me then?
That's the point. You haven't stated your reasoning therefore I might agree with it and I might not. Like I said, it wasn't a debate....just a question.
All schools do NOT have a policy that say it must be done by a faculty member of the same sex.then why do all (I pretty much believe it's all) schools which have corporal punishment have a policy saying that it must be done by faculty member of same sex as student? why do TSA have same policy too?
I have a feeling that most (or all) schools do have corporal punishments done by same sex of student even if it's not stated in their policy.All schools do NOT have a policy that say it must be done by a faculty member of the same sex.
that I can agree with you!I have no idea how TSA determines their policies; lots of them don't make any sense.
You need to check facts and not depend on feelings.I have a feeling that most (or all) schools do have corporal punishments done by same sex of student even if it's not stated in their policy.
You need to check facts and not depend on feelings.
The person administrating corporal punishment is usually assigned by title, not sex.
I didn't say that.oh you do know the fact that most schools do not have a policy that specifically stated that it should be done by same sex as student?
Quote: Originally Posted by impaired
Ok, I see your point.
What I and others fail to understand is how you think it's inapropriate for a male principle to spank a female student, yet you feel it's ok for a homosexual to spank a male student.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
exactly why would it be a problem for a homosexual principal to spank a male student? as far as I'm concerned, that principal is a male. I don't see him as a homosexual male getting sexually aroused for spanking him. there's nothing illegal about a homosexual faculty member spanking a male student. it's within a policy as it stated that the corporal punishment is to be done by same sex gender.
Quote: Originally Posted by impaired You have made references to school policy and "other" policies that restrict who can spank whom. While we understand that you may stand behind these policies, what we really want to know is what your beef is with straight males...
Quote: Originally Posted by Jiro
how about this - why do you think it is appropriate for a male principal to spank a female student?
I didn't say that.
I do know that they don't all have that policy.
I disagree. I'm not interested in statistics or coulda woulda shoulda. Sexual Abuse is illegal - regardless of sexual orientation, age, gender, or race. PERIOD.If his sexual tendencies are towards males then the chances of sexual abuse are greater than if he were straight.
that would be a violation of federal anti-discrimination law and plus it will be prone to unnecessary lawsuits.So considering this it might be smart to include that in the policy.
but this mother consented to it because she knew the policy stated that it would be done by same sex as student.First of all, I don't approve of spanking children. But if a parent consents to a male principal spanking their female child I don't see any difference if it were done by a female principle.