Columnist Looks at Deaf Drivers
Bob Levey, Metro Columnist for The Washington Post, wrote on April 25, 2003
about a woman who was concerned when she saw two people in the car in front
of her carrying on an animated conversation in American Sign Language. She
said that traffic was moving slowly but the car was weaving quite a bit in
the lane.
Levey asked Kelby Brick, associate executive director of the National
Association of the Deaf's Law and Advocacy Center, to comment, and Kelby told
him that no driving guidelines or laws apply specifically to deaf peoplusing
sign language.
"Actually, deafness can be a source of safety, Kelby argued. Cell phones,
traffic and open windows don't distract deaf drivers, he noted.
"Even so, deaf drivers have been the object of shocking discrimination.
Before World War II, some states 'tried to abolish deaf people from getting
licenses,' Kelby said.
"In Maryland, an early 20th-century law required a deaf driver to be
accompanied in the front seat by a person with normal hearing. According to
'Deaf Heritage,' book by Jack R. Gannon, the reason was self-preservation.
"Stop signs and traffic lights were rare. 'In theory, at least, the driver
who honked first went first,' Gannon wrote. Hearing was thus essential.
"According to Kelby, studies show that deaf drivers have better safety
records than hearing drivers, even though deaf drivers have to divert their
hands and eyes to communicate with passengers.
"But every jurisdiction in America requires drives to pay full-time attention
to what they're doing, or else. If deaf drivers get distracted -- for
whatever reason -- they are just as liable to be ticketed. And they should
be."
- Thanks to ©2003 Northern Virginia Resource Center for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Persons. Source:
http://www.deafhh.org/BITS-2003/051703.htm