To be compare, UK and some EU countries are already offers civil unions or other partnership rights to gay couples.
For me, it's ok to grant an civil unions for gay couples based on state's decision but not marriage, I'm believe into traditional marriage, on between one man and one woman and my views has some change after shifted to Christian.
It should be up to state but not federal.
No question asked.
How can you say that you believe in equal rights for gays and lesbians but turn around and say "no" to their right to marry?
Secondly--it's okay for heterosexual to be married at the federal level but leave gays/lesbians at the state level? All you are creating is more divisions.
Traditional marriage doesn't exist anymore. Ward and June Cleaver don't exist anymore--never had and never will. :roll:
I don't care if you don't like my decision.
If you don't like it then don't discuss with me. :roll:
When you drag your views into the public spectrum, you will be questioned on them.
That is called a DEBATE.
If you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen
When you drag your views into the public spectrum, you will be questioned on them.
That is called a DEBATE.
If you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen!
WRONG.
Marriage is a FEDERAL issue, NOT a state issue.
Why? Marriage: 1,138 FEDERAL RIGHTS.
Heterosexual marriages are federally recognized, it is HYPOCRITICAL not to FEDERALLY recognize SAME-SEX marriages.
If people not e-kissing your arse makes you lose respect for people, you need to re-evaluate if you want to debate.
AKA: I am giving you the FACTS, which you are calling WHINING because you have no good rebuttle argument.
This has nothing to do with respect, it has to do with you sticking your head in the ground and ignoring a good argument. Marriage has federal rights, it is a federal issue. Thanks for the easy debate, sweetcheeks.
This is a debate thread. Don't like what I have to say, don't post.
Duh?
LOL. Then stop posting, or respond to the actual TOPIC.
Marriage = 1138 FEDERAL RIGHTS.
THANKS.