Life sentence for French killer

Liebling:-)))

Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
31,020
Reaction score
10
Life sentence for French killer

A 66-year-old man has been sentenced to life in prison by a French court for murdering seven girls and young women.

Michel Fourniret, dubbed the "Ogre of the Ardennes", had admitted kidnapping and killing his victims between 1987 and 2001.

It is one of France's biggest serial killing cases in decades.

The court in Charleville-Mezieres also gave his wife Monique Olivier a life sentence for complicity. She helped trap the victims.

Olivier, 59, must serve at least 28 years of her prison term, the court said.

The seven victims - most of whom were raped - were aged between 12 and 22. They were shot, strangled, or stabbed to death.

Most were killed in the Ardennes region of northern France and in Belgium.

Fourniret would spot a potential victim while driving and stop to ask for directions, then persuade them to get into his car.

CONFIRMED VICTIMS

Isabelle Laville: Kidnapped in 1987 in Auxerre, central France, aged 17, and raped; body found in 2000

Fabienne Leroy: Kidnapped and raped in Chalons-en-Champagne, eastern France, in 1988 aged 20; found next day

Jeanne-Marie Desramault: Kidnapped in Charleville-Mezieres in 1989, aged 22; found in 2004 at Fourniret's former property

Elisabeth Brichet (in picture above, held by father Francis): Abducted in Namur, Belgium, in 1989, aged 12; found in 2004 at Fourniret's former property

Natacha Danais: Kidnapped in 1990 near Nantes, western France, aged 13; found three days later on nearby beach

Celine Saison: Kidnapped in Charleville-Mezieres in 2000, aged 18, and raped; found three months later in Belgium

Mananya Thumphong: Abducted in 2001 in Sedan, north-east France, aged 13, and raped; found in Belgium in 2002

Couple who hunted virgins
Parrish parents continue quest


His wife's presence in the vehicle was designed to help reassure the victim, according to the prosecution.

Fourniret was arrested in Belgium in 2003 after an attempt to kidnap a 13-year-old girl, who managed to run away.

Correspondents say the court proceedings failed to unlock Fourniret's personality and motives.

Although he admitted the murders, he refused to co-operate further during the two-month trial.

Marie-Jeanne Laville, the mother of 17-year-old Isabelle who was raped and killed in 1987, told AFP news agency she was "very satisfied" with the verdict.

"I can breathe again," she said.

Fourniret - who in court described himself as "an extremely dangerous individual" - said he would not appeal against his sentence.

He is suspected of kidnapping, raping and murdering British teaching assistant Joanna Parrish, 20, in 1990 while she was working in the French town of Auxerre.

He is also being investigated over the kidnap and murder of Marie-Angele Domece, a 19-year-old disabled woman from France.

He denies involvement in either woman's death.

But Roger Parrish and Pauline Sewell, Joanna Parrish's parents, issued a statement after the verdict was announced.

"This is not the final chapter in our quest for justice for Joanna; we must wait to see if Fourniret is to be charged in connection with her death," they said.

BBC NEWS | Europe | Life sentence for French killer


I saw TV news yesterday... They deserve it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




 
too bad they don't have death penalty. oh well. I don't know how mother Marie-Jeanne Laville can breathe again. the French women are going to live with fear that he may escape and rape/kill again... Maybe their prison system is worse and less humane than us. who knows :dunno2:
 
too bad they don't have death penalty. oh well. I don't know how mother Marie-Jeanne Laville can breathe again. the French women are going to live with fear that he may escape and rape/kill again... Maybe their prison system is worse and less humane than us. who knows :dunno2:

We (Europeans) are not for death penalty. We are satisfy what we get is right punishment, not vengenace.
 
What is an exact example?

i'm just asking hypothetically. a country with no death penalty but has a bad prison system - for ie, indirect policy of encouraging "mistreatments" of prisoners by guards and substandard quality of food. Do you care or you don't care as long as they get what they deserve?
 
i'm just asking hypothetically. a country with no death penalty but has a bad prison system - for ie, indirect policy of encouraging "mistreatments" of prisoners by guards and substandard quality of food. Do you care or you don't care as long as they get what they deserve?



Accord human rights law, mistreatment is strictly forbidden. They beleive in rehabiliation to correct their behavior and give them second chance after free from prison.

The Haworth Press Online Catalog: Article Abstract


Prison - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Accord human rights law, mistreatment is strictly forbidden. They do beleive in give criminals second chance after free from prison.

The Haworth Press Online Catalog: Article Abstract

lol... you actually believed prisons do not mistreat prisoners just cuz the human rights law said so? Well I said HYPOTHETICALLY. No need to give me sources since it does not apply to hypothetical situations. It's nice and convenient that we have a penal system to punish the criminal behaviors but unfortunately they are frequently ignored by thugs. So we're gonna forget about human rights law for a moment because it's certainly going to be ignored by guards. A country with no death penalty but systematically mistreated the prisoners like... say Michel Fourniret. Do you have a problem about that?

and I suppose you're fine with giving 2nd chance to Michel Fourniret aka the "Ogre of the Ardennes"
 
and I suppose you're fine with giving 2nd chance to Michel Fourniret aka the "Ogre of the Ardennes

I do beleive in give criminal 2nd chance, not serial killers and severe murders.
 
lol... you actually believed prisons do not mistreat prisoners just cuz the human rights law said so? Well I said HYPOTHETICALLY. No need to give me sources since it does not apply to hypothetical situations. It's nice and convenient that we have a penal system to punish the criminal behaviors but unfortunately they are frequently ignored by thugs. So we're gonna forget about human rights law for a moment because it's certainly going to be ignored by guards. A country with no death penalty but systematically mistreated the prisoners like... say Michel Fourniret. Do you have a problem about that?

US and EU justice system are total different. We have human rights law which US doesn't. The former criminals can SUE guarders for bodily harm. It was happened several times before.
 
US and EU justice system are total different. We have human rights law which US doesn't. The former criminals can SUE guarders for bodily harm. It was happened several times before.
I see... avoiding my hypothetical question... I'm asking you hypothetically if you have any problem with guards mistreating Michel Fourniret. well since this murderer is French... I'm going to limit it to France prison system.

link
 
I see... avoiding my hypothetical question... I'm asking you hypothetically if you have any problem with guards mistreating Michel Fourniret. well since this murderer is French... I'm going to limit it to France prison system.

I don't care what and how they treat serial killer/murder there in prison... but I only share what I know about human rights, that's all. Anyway, all what I care is they deserve their punishment!!! Work hard and work long hours.... They can mistreat serial killers whatever they wants but without bodily harm. (beat up etc).


Like what I said in previous post "The former criminals can SUE guarders for bodily harm. It was happened several times before."
 
I don't care what and how they treat serial killer/murder there in prison... but I only share what I know about human rights, that's all. Anyway, all what I care is they deserve their punishment!!! Work hard and work long hours.... They can mistreat serial killers whatever they wants but without bodily harm. (beat up etc).
Funny how you'd prefer that over death penalty. doesn't that make you somewhat masochist? oh well :dunno2:

Like what I said in previous post "The former criminals can SUE guarders for bodily harm. It was happened several times before."
unfortunately not for criminals with life sentence. I'm not concerned with low level criminals. They're of no concerns to me and are no huge danger to public. Suing prisons is extremely difficult because one can argue their abuses were caused by cell mates.
 
Oh, that's sad about french man did murdered 7 girls.

lol, Liebling, this case isn't pro-justice, just messing with you.

Yup, Europe and USA are different for justice system.
 
Funny how you'd prefer that over death penalty. doesn't that make you somewhat masochist? oh well :dunno2:

No, there're no comparison between death penalty and life imprisonment. Life imprisonment is right punishment..., not vengenance. They stayed there rest of their life and work hard what they wants them to do which is right punishment... volience and beat up is not right punishment but abusive. Death penalty is not right punishment but vengence and murder.

Again, I do not care what and how serial killers are being treat as long as they handle correctly accord the law.



unfortunately not for criminals with life sentence. I'm not concerned with low level criminals. They're of no concerns to me and are no huge danger to public. Suing prisons is extremely difficult because one can argue their abuses were caused by cell mates.

Yes, it was happened in England before. They won at court against prison guards with the help from witnesses and prison doctors.
 
No, there're no comparison between death penalty and life imprisonment. Life imprisonment is right punishment..., not vengenance. They stayed there rest of their life and work hard what they wants them to do which is right punishment... volience and beat up is not right punishment but abusive. Death penalty is not right punishment but vengence and murder. Again, I do not care what and how serial killers are being treat as long as they handle correctly accord the law.
Interesting justification but I'll leave at that.

Yes, it was happened in England before. They won at court against prison guards with the help from witnesses and prison doctors.
I wonder how many cases like this.. I imagine far too few. Again - it's of no concern to me. I don't care to talk about low-level criminals - only hardened criminals.
 
Back
Top