faire_jour
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,188
- Reaction score
- 3
Great article, great thread.
I specially want to point out the final part.
Viable languages: Have population bases that are sufficiently large and thriving to mean that no threat to long-term survival is likely;
Viable but small languages: Have more than c. 1,000 speakers, and are spoken in communities that are isolated or with a strong internal organization, and aware of the way their language is a marker of identity;
Endangered languages: Are spoken by enough people to make survival a possibility, but only in favourable circumstances and with a growth in community support;
Nearly extinct languages: Are thought to be beyond the possibility of survival, usually
As I just said a couples of days ago in another thread, Deaf community needs to realize that they need to perpetuate in their own way.
I want to see Deaf scientists... Deaf artists... I want to see investigations made by the Deaf... EVERYWHERE... not just in youtube... or in organizations still lead by hearings... but then again, how're you going to perpetuate? You need to documentate in some way your achivements. A way that's accepted by all the deaf around the world. Oral-written languages can't be the answer, otherwise, you'll rely more on those than in your own.
How does the deaf comunity see to theyselves?
"Viable"? "Nearly extinct"?
I know you dont see yourselves nearly extinct... but I can speak about my local community, that the argentinean sign language is "spoken by enough people to make survival a possibility, but only in favourable circumstances and with a growth in community support" will survive.
"Community support".
That's the key.
"Aware of the way their language is a marker of identity"
That's the way- Language is a marker of identity.
Fight for it.
I would say ASL is "endangered". It needs support and growth.