This is interesting. I've worked for a Private Military Firm in the past whilst contracting for the British MoD, and have many friends and relatives who have served, or are still serving in the British, Irish or Australian Armed forces.
I applied to join the Australian Reserves a few years ago and because of my declining hearing was told that I wouldn't be eligible ( I didn't actually realise I had defective hearing at that point ). This wasn't so much a problem by itself, since I was heading towards the upper age-limit cut-off point anyway - so probably not prime material anyway
, but it occured to me that what if I misheard an order and a situation occured whilst in combat?
I would be a liability to those around me, and I would be "letting my mates down" if I wasn't 100% fit for my job. I would hate to think that my disability would cause the death or serious injury of someone around me.
The speaker talks about disabled people being refused entry to the American Military, yet if you're injured and disabled whilst on active service, you're given a rear-echelon job if you're still able to serve, or if the Top Brass still think you're useful to the Military.
Now, this is the real issue I have.
If I was accepted into the Armed Forces and given one of these roles, I would potentially be taking that job away from someone who has fought for their country and been wounded in action. To have seen combat, been injured and then being suddenly medically discharged is one of the worst things in the world (a friend of mine was serving in the British Army and was medically discharged after being wounded in Bosnia in the late 90's), you feel like you're not useful to them anymore.
Whilst I applaud Keith Nolan's commitment and dedication to his cause, it just does not make sense to allow disabled people to enter the Armed Forces when hundreds of Soldiers are injured and incur a disability each year whilst in Active Service.