- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 335
A hater wil attract negativity so in your case, that is what happened. Take some responsibility for yourself.
Judge rules California's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional
- Thread starter Foxrac
- Start date
A hater wil attract negativity so in your case, that is what happened. Take some responsibility for yourself.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 335
Frisky Feline
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 26,316
- Reaction score
- 92
hypocrite :roll: I'm not telling who.
Who's the real support for "I do" gay marriage.
I know it's not me. that is for sure. I love to be a faghag.
As soon as you put on a thinking cap....it will be hard to find one for that little head you have.
I have always taken responsibility for myself...but i wont take responsibility of a fked up human race...will you?
Look who's talking.
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,879
- Reaction score
- 7
somedeafdudefromPNW
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 1
Something like NAMBLA won't really gain official recognization unless we revert back to the pre-Industrial Revolutions days. But since even the United Nations has child rights resolutions, I highly doubt that the United States, or any other westernized country will revert back to that state for a long time to come, especially since so many of us treasure our childhood dearly.
natty_4ever
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 351
- Reaction score
- 0
Wirelessly posted
You have no right to say that about anyone. That was taking it way too far. There is no messed up race of people, but there are certainly messed up ways of thinking. Kind of like the way you just collectively insulted the GLBT community, along with their friends and family.
rolling7 said:
You have no right to say that about anyone. That was taking it way too far. There is no messed up race of people, but there are certainly messed up ways of thinking. Kind of like the way you just collectively insulted the GLBT community, along with their friends and family.
somedeafdudefromPNW
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 1
On their own forum too...
Ohhhh, okay. Yes, let's put on our thinking caps...
So you mean, like, now people will want to marry their sisters, or 12 year olds, or unborn fetuses. That kind of stuff, right? Oh shit, open the floodgates!
Your whole argument is based on the fact that you think homosexuality is immoral, so therefore marriage will become immoral. Absolutely ridiculous.
Did you know that Ted Olson, the lawyer who argued the case and won is a CONSERVATIVE. In fact, he's the dude who won the case that put George Bush in the White House, and he says there is a fundamental right to same sex marriage.
Get off your high horse and quit trying to pass judgment on others. Let God worry about it.
Shows how stupid you are. I never said homosexuality is immoral and I have never passed judgement on anyone. Do you even know how to read?
I don't think GBLT community screwed human race up...
And I never sid they did nor are they exclusively doing so.
Want to explain how I "collectively insulted the GLBT community"? Did you even read my original? The brief that the judge used is so fked up that it open "marriage" to a whole new world of options, none of them good.
Everyone, do me a favor and get yourself a copy of the judge's brief and read it before you open your mouth again.
somedeafdudefromPNW
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 1
That he defined marriage as a civil, not a religious, process? Oh geez, let not recognize any atheist marriages then.
I don't understand what you're panicking about? Minors, mentally ill underneath guardianships, animals, inanimate objects or imaginary objects cannot legally give consent.
I don't understand what you're panicking about? Minors, mentally ill underneath guardianships, animals, inanimate objects or imaginary objects cannot legally give consent.
Lol, the ol' "If I didn't say it, then I am not guilty of believing it" defense. So answer the questions, chump: Do you think homosexuality is immoral? And if so, then what should happen to homosexuals?
See, there is this thing called IMPLIED MEANING. Look it up, braniac.
You might want to check who you're talking with before you start calling people stupid or ask if they know how to read. I think it's clear to most people here who the idiot is.
For someone that KNOWS (notice I did not use the word believe nor don't believe) there is no such thing as god, there is no moral nor immoral. The people of the world make up labels and I don't care how the define themself because who there are is who they want to be so let them be. I have never passed judgement but I will make a point to say something is illogical/stupid, nevertheless that is my opinion alone. To say you believe something is stupid and lazy because the word :believe, to me, means I am too lazy to find out the facts that are exact so I can say I KNOW. Believe is based on faith and faith is base on no logical proof, just accepted as is. That is crazy.