Jeff Mizanskey: Marijuana Lifer Scheduled for First Parole Hearing

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
Jeff Mizanskey—the Missouri inmate who has become the poster child for sentencing reform in regard to the offense of marijuana possession—is scheduled this week for his first parole hearing since receiving a life sentence with no possibility for an early release nearly two decades ago.

On Thursday, the 62-year-old will take full advantage of a recent commutation granted by Missouri Governor Jay Nixon, which stated that Mizanskey now has the “opportunity to demonstrate that he deserves parole.” After waiting three months for a hearing, the veteran inmate hopes the parole board will acknowledge that his sentence has never fit the crime and ultimately hand over the keys to his freedom.

In the early 1990s, Mizanskey fell victim to Missouri’s three-strike rule, which earned him a life sentence with no chance of parole over three separate non-violent, marijuana-related offenses. He has resided at the Jefferson City maximum-security Correctional Center ever since.

Despite the fact there are thousands of prisoners across the country serving life sentences for similar crimes, Mizanskey’s case has become one of the most highly recognized in the United States.

Earlier this year, a legion of lawmakers from the Missouri General Assembly signed a letter begging Governor Nixon for his release, while a petition authored by Mizanskey’s son, Chris, has also managed to collect nearly 400,000 signatures in favor of his freedom.

Yet, in a letter written by Mizanskey, back in January, the prisoner indicated that he had all but lost faith in ever seeing the light of day again. He penned speculations over how many more years he may have left in his life, while also expressing a fear of dying in prison.

Although Mizanskey admits that the news of his commutation was a shock, a recent interview with 41 Action News revealed that the lifer still remains apprehensive about ever being released.

“Just because you’re going up for parole, don’t mean you make it,” Mizanskey said, adding that had it not been for the outpouring of support from so many legislators, he doubts Governor Nixon would have even considered his commutation.

Even Mizanskey’s attorney Dan Viets, who will be present during the hearing, said that he, too, is not fully confident that his client will emerge victorious. However, he believes there are plenty of reasons to go into the hearing with a positive outlook.

“It’s not a sure thing,” he said, “but I’m optimistic, and I think everyone who’s familiar with the system is optimistic.”

Viets went on to say that Mizanskey’s chances for being awarded an early release are much better now that Governor Nixon sent “a strong signal to the parole board” by granting the commutation.

HIGH TIMES will deliver updates on Mizanskey’s progress, as it is made available.

http://www.hightimes.com/read/jeff-mizanskey-marijuana-lifer-scheduled-first-parole-hearing
 
don't understand,if he sentenced to no parole how come he getting it..seems very cruel to me life sentence for that..yet in some states it legal this what I never understand about American law rr and other tried to explain it but I still no wiser
 
don't understand,if he sentenced to no parole how come he getting it..seems very cruel to me life sentence for that..yet in some states it legal this what I never understand about American law rr and other tried to explain it but I still no wiser

Seems he was sentenced by the 3 strikes you are out...and when he was sentenced, marijuana was not legal.....now the Laws have changed in many states.
 
the three strikes is good idea but maybe used in different types of crime
 
the three strikes was Cilnton not bush am I right
 
Three strike is NOTa good idea. Unless the motive is to stock prisons with non violent offenders. Then indeed it has worked like a charm
Besides thst its a failure. And it shows.
Hope he get out.
 
Three strike is NOTa good idea. Unless the motive is to stock prisons with non violent offenders. Then indeed it has worked like a charm
Besides thst its a failure. And it shows.
Hope he get out.

Well i think it could be successful if it was tweaked a little... You do know that a lot of crime is caused by a very small number of perpetrators right?
 
Well i think it could be successful if it was tweaked a little... You do know that a lot of crime is caused by a very small number of perpetrators right?

Yes...i know.
I also know the vast majority of cons sre their for non violent offences.
 
Did you hear President Obama recent speech? He just mentioned for those who had drug offenses does NOT owe 20 years, or even life, mentioned that our prison has 4 times more inmates than in China, and 25% total of world prison total inmates! Image 1 out of every 4 prison inmate is in united States, thats way, way too much. Obama even mentioned that US have achieved highest number of inmate in prison anywhere in the world within last 20 years. That shows that the system isn't working, also he mentioned that if we cut down from 20 years term to 1 year term we could have more money for college tuition, and other worthwhile expenses to help America prosper.

Thanks Boehner for stepping down! I smell major changes in the horizon. Including DGM.
 
don't understand,if he sentenced to no parole how come he getting it..
He gets a chance at parole because the governor of that state commuted (reduced the severity) of his sentence:

"On Thursday, the 62-year-old will take full advantage of a recent commutation granted by Missouri Governor Jay Nixon, which stated that Mizanskey now has the 'opportunity to demonstrate that he deserves parole.'”

Governors of each state have the power to do that for prisoners within their own states.

seems very cruel to me life sentence for that..yet in some states it legal this what I never understand about American law rr and other tried to explain it but I still no wiser
State laws are not uniform from state to state because the populations, history and demographics of each state are different.

It's like comparing European countries. Italy doesn't have the same laws as France, and France doesn't have the same laws as Norway, and Norway doesn't have the same laws as England, etc. Even the member nations of the European Union have different laws within their own countries.
 
He gets a chance at parole because the governor of that state commuted (reduced the severity) of his sentence:

"On Thursday, the 62-year-old will take full advantage of a recent commutation granted by Missouri Governor Jay Nixon, which stated that Mizanskey now has the 'opportunity to demonstrate that he deserves parole.'”

Governors of each state have the power to do that for prisoners within their own states.


State laws are not uniform from state to state because the populations, history and demographics of each state are different.

It's like comparing European countries. Italy doesn't have the same laws as France, and France doesn't have the same laws as Norway, and Norway doesn't have the same laws as England, etc. Even the member nations of the European Union have different laws within their own countries.
They different countries you are not
 
They different countries you are not
That's right. But each US state, just like each European country, has a different history, population and demographics. That's why each state has a different viewpoint, goals, resources and cultures that influence the laws and management of their respective states.
 
You have FBI that uniform through out country you all citizen under one flag we not
 
This law has nothing to do with president of United States. Its state's own version of law. Missouri state (NOT USA) voted and passed 3 strike law, and it applies only within state of Missouri. Few other states had them enacted and repealed after they saw prison population shot up to the point where it hurts state budget.
the three strikes was Cilnton not bush am I right
 
They different countries you are not

Your simply confused between State and Federal, they are completely different from each other. Federal never have 3 strike law in their federal law book, only some states have them, many already repealed.
 
Your right, he left prison about 3 weeks ago I think. He now is free, and he actually declined a joint and don't want risk on returning to prison. He thinks 21 years is way too harsh.

It is way too harsh... Thee stikes does not make any sense to me. One down and so many more to go...
 
It is way too harsh... Thee strikes does not make any sense to me. One down and so many more to go...

The three-strikes law is already repealed (removed), that is why he was set free. It is not justify keep those who violate old law that is no longer on book remain in prison. That old law is GONE, why should Jeff continue to serve? That is whole point here. And yup more there to go. I do sign petition on Change.org, Jeff was one of my supporter, I have signed for many others depending on case. One of them I refused sign was Meth user and manufacturing, that view is against my belief because those who manufacture and use meth pose greater risk to community. It is not fair for Meth factory to be in my neighborhood because it will almost guarantee devalue my house and contaminate my property and me pay for clean up? TSK TSK nope!
 
Back
Top