iPad Pro is faster than 15 inches MacBook Pro with i5 Core

Jiro said:
who needs a bigger internal storage when there is a cloud storage? get one. it makes your life much easier.
Click to expand...

The cloud storage is useless because I have very slow upload and I live in small town.
 
Foxrac said:
The cloud storage is useless because I have very slow upload and I live in small town.
Click to expand...

that's just you. for majority of people... it's very useful.

and for your problem... you should get a "personal cloud server".
 
Jiro said:
that's just you. for majority of people... it's very useful.

and for your problem... you should get a "personal cloud server".
Click to expand...

That's only true for denser urban and suburb.

Cable and telephone companies aren't going to improving the broadband in low density suburb and rural, also we pressured on cable company to install cable and our subdivision have over 100 houses, but they refused for no reason.

I'm sticking with my gaming rig and laptop, and I have extra HDD for backup.

The cloud service is only good for small file size, especially for slow upload.
 
There is a reason, they don't want to pay for it cause they won't get it back in reasonable amount of time.

Foxrac said:
That's only true for denser urban and suburb.

Cable and telephone companies aren't going to improving the broadband in low density suburb and rural, also we pressured on cable company to install cable and our subdivision have over 100 houses, but they refused for no reason.

I'm sticking with my gaming rig and laptop, and I have extra HDD for backup.

The cloud service is only good for small file size, especially for slow upload.
Click to expand...
 
Another way is to use USB flash drive for storage.

Foxrac said:
The cloud storage is useless because I have very slow upload and I live in small town.
Click to expand...
 
Secretblend said:
There is a reason, they don't want to pay for it cause they won't get it back in reasonable amount of time.
Click to expand...

That's not true, there is cable line that share with electricity poles in our city (subdivision's enterance) and it make cable installation more easier, but cable company isn't interested to do the job.

Many of our neighbors complained as well and our HOA know that neighbors want to have fast internet speed so we are stuck with slower DSL.
 
Secretblend said:
There is a reason, they don't want to pay for it cause they won't get it back in reasonable amount of time.
Click to expand...

Foxrac said:
That's not true, there is cable line that share with electricity poles in our city (subdivision's enterance) and it make cable installation more easier, but cable company isn't interested to do the job.

Many of our neighbors complained as well and our HOA know that neighbors want to have fast internet speed so we are stuck with slower DSL.
Click to expand...

I like to make clarification, that's not cable company's fault for not having a cable in our neighborhood and it was developer and broker's fault for not running the cable line into neighborhood when our houses built. Our electricity is underground, not line over the pole so it make cable installation more expensive but not difficult because cable line need to be buried. If it was over the pole so it will make installation less expensive and convenient.

Our developer went bankruptcy but our broker is still working around our city so I'm not sure if he allows cable line in new neighborhood because of digital age. If he refuses so he probably have share with Directv and telephone company to keep cable out.

Google did buried the fiber to neighborhood that already built so cable companies could do it.

It is best to check with cable companies if house has cable before you buy it.

In our city, if you want have cable, you have to buy older houses that built before 2000 or house that next to main road (or highway) - it make cable installation a lot easier, or buying new houses under different brokers, especially pro-cable.
 
You just proved my point. Could they install cable if they wanted to? Yes of course! They just don't want to cause it's too expensive in return of their investment.

Foxrac said:
I like to make clarification, that's not cable company's fault for not having a cable in our neighborhood and it was developer and broker's fault for not running the cable line into neighborhood when our houses built. Our electricity is underground, not line over the pole so it make cable installation more expensive but not difficult because cable line need to be buried. If it was over the pole so it will make installation less expensive and convenient.

Our developer went bankruptcy but our broker is still working around our city so I'm not sure if he allows cable line in new neighborhood because of digital age. If he refuses so he probably have share with Directv and telephone company to keep cable out.

Google did buried the fiber to neighborhood that already built so cable companies could do it.

It is best to check with cable companies if house has cable before you buy it.

In our city, if you want have cable, you have to buy older houses that built before 2000 or house that next to main road (or highway) - it make cable installation a lot easier, or buying new houses under different brokers, especially pro-cable.
Click to expand...
 
Secretblend said:
You just proved my point. Could they install cable if they wanted to? Yes of course! They just don't want to cause it's too expensive in return of their investment.
Click to expand...

We have over 100 houses in our subdivision so it is good investment for cable company (Charter) so they could campaign for fast internet that allow families to watch streaming video on several devices at same time, also they have better deal for bundle. The internet and gold TV package bundle are cheaper than Directv.

Google did with fiber so cable companies could do it, especially for houses without cable line when they built under different broker.

They could let contractors to do it for less money.
 
Secretblend said:
You just proved my point. Could they install cable if they wanted to? Yes of course! They just don't want to cause it's too expensive in return of their investment.
Click to expand...

foxrac - I don't know if you really understand that.

what secretblend is saying that a cable company would be very willing to pay for expense to dig up the ground and install cable for the neighborhood but they will only do that if they calculate that they will reap in the profit in certain time.

if the whole neighborhood is willing to switch over to that cable company and stay with them for at least a few years... then the cable company will do it. so HOA will have to get together and have a discussion with cable company rep.
 
Jiro said:
foxrac - I don't know if you really understand that.

what secretblend is saying that a cable company would be very willing to pay for expense to dig up the ground and install cable for the neighborhood but they will only do that if they calculate that they will reap in the profit in certain time.

if the whole neighborhood is willing to switch over to that cable company and stay with them for at least a few years... then the cable company will do it. so HOA will have to get together and have a discussion with cable company rep.
Click to expand...

I understand about what he said.

Yes, in most cases, developers usually running the cable line underground when they building the new house so save cable company from burden on cost of installing cable.

When houses finished the built without cable line so burden goes to cable company so if there are fewer houses and they aren't going to install, anyway.

We only have DSL - max is 12 mbps download and 600 kbps for upload. My videophone has poor quality when outgoing but good quality when incoming, so I had to repeat to make clear.
 
Secretblend, if you don't like about what I'm saying so please ignore my post and you have difficult to understand about what I'm saying. I know you hate me since joined this forum and you are my enemy - you are causing the problem with me. I don't need you to cause a lot of mess in this thread.

I agreed with you and Jiro about cable company but you turned to against me so obviously you are enemy.
 
I don't hate you. I just get frustrated cause.. You know what? I am wanting to say more but I'm gonna stop right here.
 
Secretblend said:
I don't hate you. I just get frustrated cause.. You know what? I am wanting to say more but I'm gonna stop right here.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree with you about cable company but I do like to discuss more.

I'm sorry that you are frustrated and my English isn't very good.

I just saying that I agree with your point about cable company and I have no reason to object your statement. I'm sorry for expressed my frustration.
 
Foxrac said:
I don't disagree with you about cable company but I do like to discuss more.

I'm sorry that you are frustrated and my English isn't very good.

I just saying that I agree with your point about cable company and I have no reason to object your statement. I'm sorry for expressed my frustration.
Click to expand...

If you agree, then why did you say things contrary to what you agreed with?
 
Back
Top