Originally posted by BostonIceFire
I am having a problem with two specific interpreters here at RIT.
They are both from one class I am taking. This one interpreter (about in her 40s) signs very strong ASL and she does not interpret what the teacher is saying. This is one of the difficult course I am taking which is nearly the same as a course at law school. She makes it like a story of the jury, the lawyers, judge, into a lively story. I'm like.. she is not interpreting the real process of how jury is really selected, how the lawyers function in courts.
Now this other interpreter is a freaking student interpreter and can't sign for shit.
News flash.. they are both partners (lesbian) and they keep talking to each other in class, giving each other food, asking if they need to call home to check on children, over and over..
They drive me nuts.
You went to court because you want them to sign SEE, yet you tell us that you love ASL? What's up with that?Originally posted by LezArtist
I know there are many different problems with other different deafies. So let me tell you mine. So, I lived in Dallas, Texas until I was 10 years old. I signed SEE (Sign Exact English) And I got so used to it. Then I moved to Davenport, Iowa. Then I ended up in mainstream for the first time (which i hated it) And my interpreter was signing ASL that already made me LOST in a damn HOLE and overwhemled! So I tried to tell my mom and my mom didn't even believe me until end of the school year then. My mom and I had been going through COURT and trying to fight for my rights to get an interpreter that I could understand but at the same time through out my school years. I learned a lot about ASL. So I love both but mostly I love ASL because it always shows the actions than SEE u know what i am trying to say??
Originally posted by lfreed
right on fly free. it's wonderful to see that you give feedback and ask questions when needed. this kind of action will only help interpreters, at least the terps who are interested in achieving professionalism, improve in serving the deaf/hh community. educational intepreting does have a code of ethics, but it varies from state to state. i say use common sense and remember a child's educational should come first. in relation to college, vr, court, medical kinds of interpreting i feel it is much more important to follow the code of ethics establised by RID. it is wise for the terp to pay close attention to these codes. flyfree, another great point about terps who are immersed in deaf culture, but tend to stray from what's right. i see that a lot and some are really great terps. almost like they forget what's professional because they become really comfortable. hey, i think we all have been guilty of this at some point.
i will say to anyone in any situation that gives feedback to do so constructively and always be upfront and honest.
also, javapride, i'm sure you are more than qualified to assess where a terp would be better suited, but be most careful. from my experience most situations are different and call for different measuers. either way you being proactive is wonderful and i would love to be able to interpret for deaf/hh individuals that are honest and helpful like some of you guys. peace
BostonIceFire said:I am having a problem with two specific interpreters here at RIT.
They are both from one class I am taking. This one interpreter (about in her 40s) signs very strong ASL and she does not interpret what the teacher is saying. This is one of the difficult course I am taking which is nearly the same as a course at law school. She makes it like a story of the jury, the lawyers, judge, into a lively story. I'm like.. she is not interpreting the real process of how jury is really selected, how the lawyers function in courts.
Now this other interpreter is a freaking student interpreter and can't sign for shit.
News flash.. they are both partners (lesbian) and they keep talking to each other in class, giving each other food, asking if they need to call home to check on children, over and over..
They drive me nuts.