Reba said:Not like a whole lecture or appointment. Sometimes the chemicals are so strong I really could use a respirator instead of just a mask, but that is not possible.
I use the same "equipment" as the students (they complain about the fumes, too). The classroom doesn't have adequate ventilation. Sometimes it is worse for me than the students because I am facing "downwind", and the students face "upwind". I hope the situation will be better next semester.Banjo said:What kind of mask did you wear?
For airbrushing classes, I had to wear a Twin Filter Half Mask. It costs around 40 bucks (student price). Yes, it's a respirator. You shouldn't had went into these places without wearing one. If the fumes are strong, it means you should wear a respirator. Just my honest opinion.
It's crazy that they didn't have you wearing one! As an interpreter, you are entitled to receive one at their expenses. At least that's what would happen if you work in Ontario.
It depends on the situation and the environment.Safari said:I didn't realized that you have had to required to wear the smock and mask during terp at school. I only knew terps wear mask and gloves during labor/birth at the hospitals.
Very true!javapride said:...the more infos i have the better chances i can on passing
As a church interpreter, my dress code is all black, black long sleeve dress shirt, black slacks, and black dress shoes. When I minister in song in sign language as a special for the church, I will wear white cotton gloves so my hands can be seen
I guess you would handle it the same way as having a lecturer, doctor, lawyer, instructor, or any kind of presenter who is attractive.I haven't read through all of the comments, yet, so this may have already been brought up... I'm curious what the general opinion is of having to look at an interpreter that the consumer finds to be attractive. I have, on 2 occasions, been distracted by just the level of attractiveness of an interpreter that was present.
I haven't read through all of the comments, yet, so this may have already been brought up... I'm curious what the general opinion is of having to look at an interpreter that the consumer finds to be attractive. I have, on 2 occasions, been distracted by just the level of attractiveness of an interpreter that was present.