jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
But it seems Miss Kat understands the material in her first language so I dont see the need for an oral terp but probably would see the need for an ASL terp in a mainstreamed setting but that means Miss Kat would not get direct communication like she gets at the BiBi program anymore. The question is ..which is more important to the OP?
There you go. In order to get the oral interpreter, it will have to be shown that it is needed for comprehension, and not just because the parent wants more speech in the classroom. And, as the child is still dependent upon visual language despite recent improvements in hearing, it would be much easier to show need for the ASL terp in the mainstream. What people fail to understand is that the IEP is written with educational goals in mind, and if the child is making improvements that are age appropriate in language skills, the parent does not have the right to dictate methodology to the school system.