I'd like to ask anyone who is similar to me in that I could once hear, became deaf then got the implant. How much of a shock was your own speech to you? I'd just like to talk to someone who has gone through what I might go through soon.
I'd like to ask anyone who is similar to me in that I could once hear, became deaf then got the implant. How much of a shock was your own speech to you? I'd just like to talk to someone who has gone through what I might go through soon.
Ron,
For me, I'm going with Advanced Bionics for my Cochlear Implant for many reasons. They have a discussion board that they moderate called hearingjourney.com which is full of just CI users (Advanced Bionics, of course) and has plenty of activity.
It might be what you're looking for.
Good luck and please keep us updated on your CI journey!
And I am Freedom user and i used this website too... very useful.
HearAgain....JW......do you think it's a good idea in general for people to try a bimodal approach?
Ronjaxon,
Just for your information, I am an adult who lost her hearing and recieved a CI in March of this year after several years of debating. I am implanted with a Freedom from cochlear America company. I found that I needed listening therapy more so than speech therapy. Cochlear america offers a wonderful CD called Sound and Way beyond that was developed for teenagers and adults to practice listening. I found this to be very helpful. I wish you luck in your journey. It is an amazing experience.
What about people who have deep profound losses in both ears?Yes I do only because one never knows how beneficial a HA in the nonimplanted ear can be.
I know many people who are successful CI/HA users. They function quite well using a bimodal approach and do not see any reason to have a second CI.
The only population I think should be given bilateral CIs from the start are the deafblind for obvious reasons
What about people who have deep profound losses in both ears?
...
I know many people who are successful CI/HA users. They function quite well using a bimodal approach and do not see any reason to have a second CI.
The only population I think should be given bilateral CIs from the start are the deafblind for obvious reasons.
I definitely agree with both points.
The first point because I prefer the minimalist approach for CIs. Enough to get the job done but not go overboard with it either. If one can use a HA in the other ear, then all the better. One can always get a second CI down the road.
The second point because this group benefits the most from bilaterals from the get go.
FYI - I have just one and I'm doing extremely well with it. I see no reason to get a second CI anytime soon. I never heard with two ears so what I'm "missing" is no big deal.