One of several good examples that AOL sucks here!
Here is the email excerpt from the DeafWeekly regarding to his subscriptions whom uses AOL.... here it's:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sending out emails can be a challenge for legitimate emailers like Deafweekly. Sometimes we get caught up in the same nets that are designed to catch spam.
For me, it's like dropping a stamped envelope in the mailbox. After that, it's out of my hands and I have to trust the system to do its job. The post office does a great job of getting snail mail to its destination, but the Internet still has a long way to go in dealing with the spam problem.
I did not get today's issue at my AOL addresses and upon checking the recipient list, I saw that no one from AOL had opened today's issue. Apparently AOL has decided that this week's Deafweekly is spam and will not let its members receive it.
I am working with the company that handles our mailing to resolve this issue ... which we both thought had been resolved just two weeks ago.
I don't know if this message will get through to our AOL readers, but please keep in mind that occasional delivery problems will happen and it is always an option to read the current and back issues on our website --
Welcome to Deafweekly. They look better there than in the emails, anyway
Thank you for your continuing support,
Tom Willard
Editor, Deafweekly
-----------------------------------------------------------
Even AOL users do sometime lose their emails sent from their subscriptions other than DeafWeekly's. AOL's powerful spam filter is rather too much that it accidently blocked even some of them were legimate.
There are many online businesses and organizations prohbits AOL users to use their AOL email address(es) to subscribe or participate or apply for due to the AOL spam filters that create such problems like the DeafWeekly editor experiences. Safelists and such prohbits them, too.
You should notice that there are 2 links, one for common email users with standard links for the weblink while it is inserted with another link specified for the AOL users in order to reach the weblink. It's rather a hassle for the senders and linkers.
Also that AOL browser has way too much features on it that many don't bother to use half of them... such a waste. That adds up why we, AOL haters, don't like AOL.
I do only use their AIM service, however.