Audiofuzzy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2005
- Messages
- 4,697
- Reaction score
- 151
You can see here where exactly CI is located:
Fuzzy
Fuzzy
The CI is NOT !!!!!!!! inside the brain!
Fuzzy
Indeed but that seems to be lost on some people!
Keep on saying it long enough and hopefully it will stick in some people's brain.
But there's a big hole in your head to "plug" the coil in, right?
Big?!? There is a small hole where they put the electrode into the cochlea. Is that what you are referring to? Otherwise, I have no idea of the "coil" you speak of.
Sorry soars, I was kidding.
I see anti-CI'ers mention the "fact" that the CI is in the brain, and the "fact" that the person is left with a big hole in their skull after the surgery so that the coil (the part with the magnet on it that sticks to the head) can be "plugged in".
Anyone know why this person's CI failed him?
Anyone know why this person's CI failed him?
From what I gathered (not easily mind you) that Mr. Smith's CI probably caused some kind of allergic reaction to the metal of the CI. If this was the case, I have heard of this with other types if implants (i.e., knee and etc.) Not common but some people are more sensitive to metal than others.
Oic, sr171 and if this is the case, that's really unfortunate. So I guess this case wouldn't be one to skew the success rate, per se, being that the body's rejecting it, I guess....
That is cuz the funny inside my head.
Except that it is a factor in the success rate. If we want to have an honest conversation about when implants work or don't work, and why, we need to acknowledge it when they fail. And for all intents and purposes, this is not a successful CI.
It's useful to distinguish *why* an implant failed, and say, X% failed because of ossification, Y% because of this, Z% because of that. But included in that is that there will be some percentage of users whose bodies are unable for some reason to tolerate the implant. My guess is that this sort of failure is extremely rare - implants are made out of silicon and titanium specifically because those two materials are almost never bioreactive - but I suppose it *can* happen, and it needs to be acknowledged.
In the end, any medical procedure carries a risk of failure. I think CIs in general have demonstrated an acceptable success rate (my opinion, anyway), and that the rewards are sufficient to justify the risk of a non-working implant for many people. But that doesn't mean there's a 100% success rate, and that's to be expected with any medical procedure or body augmentation.
No one thinks you are lying
What is "the funny" inside your head? do you have headaches? do you have compulsive -obsessive disorder? do you have tinnitus (the ringing in your ear), or do you suffer from dizziness?
what is your health problem?
Fuzzy
Click on Smithr's name and you should be able to find his threads.