House Passes Bill To Bring Troops Home In '08.

[Foxrac]

Oh, without doubt, Bush will going to veto it again.

We need wait til Jan 20, 2009 with different president but impleach Bush is more diffcult, even impossible to kick out from office.

I'm 100% anti-Bush, anyway.

 

[Reba]

You can laugh what you want to.

Simple question:

Why enemies bother other countries for?

Do you realize that the Islamic terrorists attacked Americans and Europeans many times first? They hate us and want to destroy us. If we quit fighting against them, they will not quit attacking us. No. They will say, "Ha, the Americans and Europeans are weak cowards; we are winning against them!"

We delayed in fighting back much too long. We should have shown a stronger response before 9/11.

 

[Texan Guy]

Do you realize that the Islamic terrorists attacked Americans and Europeans many times first? They hate us and want to destroy us. If we quit fighting against them, they will not quit attacking us. No. They will say, "Ha, the Americans and Europeans are weak cowards; we are winning against them!"

She's right.

BTW, no offense, Liebling, when you said those soldiers died for nothing. That made me growling. They don't died for nothing, they died for their country.

Over 150,000 US troops are in Iraq. If they think this war is wrong, they should quit as they got home. But look at those troops still stay and fighting. My friend deployed to Iraq 7 times and still in Iraq.

You probably don't know how many did we killed the bad guys. To me, I think it's over 15,000 or more.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

Do you realize that the Islamic terrorists attacked Americans and Europeans many times first? They hate us and want to destroy us. If we quit fighting against them, they will not quit attacking us.

Yes I know.

They only arrest the people who are the responsibly for attack our countries, not attack their countries that because they attacked our country. Is it okay to kill innoncent people there that's because they attacked our countries? They are supposed to arrest the right people who attack our countries.

No. They will say, "Ha, the Americans and Europeans are weak cowards; we are winning against them!"

Let them!

We delayed in fighting back much too long. We should have shown a stronger response before 9/11.

It makes no sense because they simple attack Iraq without proof... Now you know that Saddam is not responsible for those 9/11... Who is war crime?

 

[Liebling:-)))]

BTW, no offense, Liebling, when you said those soldiers died for nothing. That made me growling. They don't died for nothing, they died for their country.

First of all... I am waiting for your reply on my simple question.
http://www.alldeaf.com/806261-post12.html

I will say that they die for their country if they defend against enemies' attack to our country, not go and attack their country.

Yes soliders have to die because of Bush's lie. They thought Saddam is the responsible for cause 9/11 which he doesn't.

Why they are continue to go Iraq and then killed after Saddam's arrest then?

Over 150,000 US troops are in Iraq. If they think this war is wrong, they should quit as they got home. But look at those troops still stay and fighting. My friend deployed to Iraq 7 times and still in Iraq.

Excuse me, like what I say before that you need to see both sides...

US Troops Told They Can't Leave Army
'Finger in the Dike': US Troops Told They Can't Leave Army

5500 US deserters : We won’t fight in Iraq
5500 US deserters : We won't fight in Iraq

Thousands of troops say they won't fight
Voters For Peace: The power to end the war and prevent future wars of aggression

Soldiers Against Iraq War Refuse To Fight
informationliberation - Soldiers Against Iraq War Refuse To Fight

Three U.S. Soldiers Refusing to Fight Speak Out Against the Iraq War
Democracy Now! | Three U.S. Soldiers Refusing to Fight Speak Out Against the Iraq War

Withdrawal?
Withdrawal? - Occupation and Rule in Iraq - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum

Poll Shows 2/3 of Americans Want Withdrawal of US Troops from Iraq
Poll Shows 2/3 of Americans Want Withdrawal of US Troops from Iraq

Iraq Veterans Against The War

Google-Ergebnis für http://www.williambowles.info/gispecial/2006/0306/290306/image001.jpg


Breaking Ranks to Shun War
An Army Sergeant Who Refuses to Return to Iraq Seeks a Discharge as a Conscientious Objector; He May Instead Face a Court-Martial
Google-Ergebnis für http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/images/0207-01.jpg


Soldier's duty: Say no to illegal war

You probably don't know how many did we killed the bad guys. To me, I think it's over 15,000 or more.

why 15,000... How do they know that 15,000 are bad guys?

Did you know that they also killed innoncent people there as well?

 

[diehardbiker]

Who says Iraq was responsible for 9/11???? This is brand new idea of accusation!

What is real reason behind this has nothing to do with 9-11, nor even oil too!

What the reason behind is WMD agreement that Saddam and first Bush had agreed upon. Saddam repeatly violated the term agreed when US decided to withdraw the desert storm. That is where they all started, if Clinton had follow up closely, we won't have this mess, even worse if first Bush didn't believe Saddam and overthrown him in the first place, we might not have this problem.

First Bush and Clinton been too soft on Saddam.

But Saddam is not responsible for 9/11, isn't he?

The soliders have to die because Bush thought Saddam is the responsible for 9/11. Why Bush sent soliders to enemies's countries when they have no proof either it's really them or not... ?

Yes, they die for nothing...

 

[Liebling:-)))]

Who says Iraq was responsible for 9/11???? This is brand new idea of accusation!

What is real reason behind this has nothing to do with 9-11, nor even oil too!

What the reason behind is WMD agreement that Saddam and first Bush had agreed upon. Saddam repeatly violated the term agreed when US decided to withdraw the desert storm. That is where they all started, if Clinton had follow up closely, we won't have this mess, even worse if first Bush didn't believe Saddam and overthrown him in the first place, we might not have this problem.

First Bush and Clinton been too soft on Saddam.

Read here

George Washington's Blog: 9/11 Lies: Another Basis for Impeachment

Oh yes Bush made angry impression on the TV on that day and said that he is going to attack Iraq. Of course I saw on TV with my own eyes. It's him who accused Saddam in first place.... Few months later we learn that he KNEW that Saddam is not responsible... he only use this situation as an excuse to sent soliders to Iraq war is oil...

Everyone knows that Bush see after oil.

Secret US plans for Iraq's oil
BBC NEWS | Programmes | Newsnight | Secret US plans for Iraq's oil

Code Alert - Black Oil - Top 10 Reasons George Bush invaded Iraq

WAR ON IRAQ - IS OIL A MOTIVE FOR THE MILITARY CONQUEST OF IRAQ? READ THE EVIDENCE AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF.

Bush changed his speech a lot about the reasons over Iraq war... :roll:

 

[Reba]

Yes I know.

They only arrest the people who are the responsibly for attack our countries, not attack their countries that because they attacked our country.

Arrest? Do you really believe arresting a few of the conspirators is enough to stop the problem? We're not talking about a few disorganized lowlifes knocking over convenience stores.

Is it okay to kill innoncent people there that's because they attacked our countries? They are supposed to arrest the right people who attack our countries.

1. Not all of them are "innocent".

2. Truly innocent people are not targeted. However, when the bad guys intentionally hide themselves among the innocent, then the innocent are at risk.

3. The terrorists don't mind killing themselves or their own people.

Let them!

You don't mind letting them attack you? You are fine with being attacked? That's hard to believe.

It makes no sense because they simple attack Iraq without proof... Now you know that Saddam is not responsible for those 9/11...

Please pay attention. The war on terror is NOT just about what happened on 9/11. Islamic terrorism was active before 9/11, and continues to be active after 9/11. The attack on 9/11 was the main catalyst to our country finally taking real action against international terrorists. But it didn't begin with 9/11, and it didn't end with 9/11.

 

[pek1]

Ok Me

What if all soldiers leave and I am afraid that terrorists will be building up stronger and could be harmful to USA, England, and other?? :Ohno:

When our troops leave, they turn off the water and lock the valves. These terrorists can't survive without water.

As for the "innocent" people killed, well, I think the late Timothy McVeigh said it best: "Collateral damage." Here's a quarter, dear, call someone who cares. TRAVIS TRITT LYRICS - Here's A Quarter (Call Someone Who Cares)