Hillary Supporters Now Support Bush (GWB)

rockdrummer said:
I am fairly objective in the whole republician democrate thing and one think that I can tell you for sure is that republicians do seem to bash the democrates but I don't see much of the reverse. It may be due to my limited view.
Click to expand...

If you ask me, the two-party system is messed up. It's wrong when the moderate conservatives, and the moderate liberals are being mixed up with the fascists, fundamentalists and the socialists and communists.
 
rockdrummer said:
I am fairly objective in the whole republician democrate thing and one think that I can tell you for sure is that republicians do seem to bash the democrates but I don't see much of the reverse. It may be due to my limited view.
Click to expand...
Democrats severely bashed the Bush administration, including attacks on his daughters, and wishing him dead.

You don't see as much now because they aren't the party in power.
 
Banjo said:
No, but clearly something is bothering you.
Click to expand...

Clearly you are bothered or else youl wouldn't have said what you said. Now, like I said, I disapprove and dislike the current administration's policy and the path they are taking. It will simply weaken further United States' power and economic contribution.
 
kokonut said:
Clearly you are bothered or else youl wouldn't have said what you said. Now, like I said, I disapprove and dislike the current administration's policy and the path they are taking. It will simply weaken further United States' power and economic contribution.
Click to expand...

The impression I get is that the Republicans would had done the same thing, only without the mandatory insurances considering the previous administration had the same economic rhetoric as this one does. So either way, we are screwed.
 
Reba said:
Democrats severely bashed the Bush administration, including attacks on his daughters, and wishing him dead.

You don't see as much now because they aren't the party in power.
Click to expand...

That I remember. Always attacking Bush' daughters. Whereas for the Obama girls, it's "off limit." Nice change of heart I'd say. How convenient, too.
 
kokonut said:
That I remember. Always attacking Bush' daughters. Whereas for the Obama girls, it's "off limit." Nice change of heart I'd say. How convenient, too.
Click to expand...

one can say that it's because Obama girls are minors and Bush girls are..... well - grown-up. anybody who makes an attack on little kids like Obama girls do not deserve to have 1st Amendment.
 
kokonut said:
Clearly you are bothered or else youl wouldn't have said what you said. Now, like I said, I disapprove and dislike the current administration's policy and the path they are taking. It will simply weaken further United States' power and economic contribution.
Click to expand...

Oh, I was just amused by your whining, so I imitated you in a simplistic sense.
 
souggy said:
The impression I get is that the Republicans would had done the same thing, only without the mandatory insurances.
Click to expand...

Not the conservative Republicans but perhaps the RINOs in some respect. It was the Republicans who wanted to reform Social Security. Democrats all laughed at that but Bush saw the coming disaster down the road. He did the same thing about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for several years with each year warning Congress something must be down to hold them accountable and this was ignored for years (thanks Barney Frank and Chris Dodd!) which contributed to the housing bust and bank failures.
 
The fact someone is accusing people of being RINOs show that you guys need to move past the two-party system. Seriously, attacking your own party members? That's absurd.
 
No. It's when Republicans pretend to be conservative Republicans when they are not and vote liberal. Same idea with Democrats by calling the DINOs. It's okay to be critical of your own politicians.
 
take it to PM land, ya'all. so what my post?

Jiro said:
why are you so worried about fiscal responsibility? I mean... you're not exactly at the certain bracket that pays bigger tax. My dad is and has always been doing that for decades. so I don't know what you're whining about when it has no direct effect on you. :dunno:
Click to expand...
 
Banjo said:
Hmm, better lay off the cough syrup. You're seeing things. You're still amusing me.
Click to expand...

Er, I didn't say "Wah wah." :wave:

Some more Bush' comment.

The role of government is not to create wealth but to create the conditions that allow entrepreneurs and innovators to thrive.

As the world recovers, we will face a temptation to replace the risk-and-reward model of the private sector with the blunt instruments of government spending and control. History shows that the greater threat to prosperity is not too little government involvement, but too much.
Click to expand...
George W. Bush warns about too much government without naming gee-who-could-it-possibly-be? | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times

Exactly!!

And Hillary Buzz realized that now.
 
Back
Top