posts from hell
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2004
- Messages
- 9,371
- Reaction score
- 7
makes sense. hope you find out soon
Completly understood! So it's not the potential loss, it's just you really don't know. Hard to make plans when you just don't know.now that OAEs and ABRs are completely different, but all 3 audiologists I have had said that booth testing is more reliable than an ABR, that an ABR is not a "hearing test" but a nerve test, and that they take a child's behavioral response in the sound booth over an ABR test. Maybe that is wrong, I don't know...but that is what all 3 of my audis have said, and since he passed the OAE today on both ears when he has never been able to pass in the left and then responded to all the tones at normal hearing level in the sound booth other than one, which was replayed later and he then responded at 20, I can't help but be a little confused.
We are most likely still going to do the 3rd ABR, but I have been in agony for months and months with all these conflicting results.
Completly understood! So it's not the potential loss, it's just you really don't know. Hard to make plans when you just don't know.
It might be just a fluke. I will tell you that I've had ABR and they showed my loss to be profound, even thou I have a hoh loss.
Really jillo? I recall faire joure saying that a really talented audi can tell how well a toddler can hear with hearing aids, and can tell if they need a CI or not, if they are an ambigious canidate.The most accurate way to determine that is through testing that requires the child's responses to sounds, and that, unfortunately, does not come until about age 2. Even kids that show a profound loss with the ABR have been known to show a much lesser loss when response testing is done. The point is not really the level of hearing loss, but how the child responds to his hearing loss. Some people with a profound loss can speak very well, while some with just a moderate loss are unable to do so. There are just so many variables involved.
Hello, all!
My name is Lauren and I have 3 little boys, Gavin (6), Tyler (2), and Grayson (9 months).
We found out at birth that Grayson may have had a hearing loss. He referred with the newborn screening, and he had the same results at the doctor's office 2 or 3 times. I went to an audiologist who said he detected fluid and that it was probably just from birth and to have the pediatrician give him some antibiotics. My ped didn't like that answer, so she sent me somewhere else. Did an ABR when he was 2 months old, and I was very shocked when they told me that he had bilateral mild-moderate hearing loss. I didn't believe it. We had spent those first 2 months making noises, etc., and he always responded. But we never thought much about it as far as him actually having a hearing loss...surely our child was "normal."
We sought a second opinion with another ENT and audiologist. The second ABR was performed under anesthesia. It also showed a mild-moderate hearing loss, moderately-severe in 1 pitch or frequency...I am still not educated enough on all this stuff! Anyway, that was a very hard thing to accept because the results were very different than the first ABR. The first ABR showed his right ear to almost be normal hearing, whereas on the second test it showed it to be worse overall than the left.
He got his hearing aids a month later and has worn them ever since. I have always been so confused about this entire situation, though, because of the differences in tests (even our parental adviser thought there was too great of a difference from the first). Of course, the logical explanation would be that his loss had progressed, but I was always confused by that because he passed the OAE the day before he had the second ABR. And he had passed another OAE a few weeks prior to that. So, he has passed OAEs and has two different ABR results...
We are now getting a third audiologist to perform an ABR and see what we get. I would have a much easier time accepting all of this if his results MATCHED or at least were very similar, but the two ABRs had up to 25 dB differences...and then the OAEs. I know it is possible to pass an OAE and fail an ABR, but my prior audiologist said it would be impossible for him to have a 60 dB loss and pass an OAE...oh, really...????? Because he did! She didn't know he had because she wasn't the one who performed it.
Anyways, I LOVE my little boy and have been very proactive in helping him. I just want him to get the best care possible. He has been wearing his hearing aids now for 4 months, and he seems to be developing normally. Makes dada, mama, neh neh, gih gih, lala, puh sounds, etc.
I felt compelled to introduce myself because I read some posts here where people said their parents had always taken their hearing aids off in pix. I think that is terrible! I NEVER take my son's aids off for pix. I mean, sure, it may be "better" aesthetically from a vain society's standpoint not to have them in the pix, but they are something he needs! I would never want him to wonder why we took something he needed from him for a picture...that's like taking a person out of a wheelchair for a picture...
Any input anyone has as to the weirdness of my son's tests is appreciated as well....here is a pic of Grayson!
Hello, all!
My name is Lauren and I have 3 little boys, Gavin (6), Tyler (2), and Grayson (9 months).
We found out at birth that Grayson may have had a hearing loss. He referred with the newborn screening, and he had the same results at the doctor's office 2 or 3 times. I went to an audiologist who said he detected fluid and that it was probably just from birth and to have the pediatrician give him some antibiotics. My ped didn't like that answer, so she sent me somewhere else. Did an ABR when he was 2 months old, and I was very shocked when they told me that he had bilateral mild-moderate hearing loss. I didn't believe it. We had spent those first 2 months making noises, etc., and he always responded. But we never thought much about it as far as him actually having a hearing loss...surely our child was "normal."
We sought a second opinion with another ENT and audiologist. The second ABR was performed under anesthesia. It also showed a mild-moderate hearing loss, moderately-severe in 1 pitch or frequency...I am still not educated enough on all this stuff! Anyway, that was a very hard thing to accept because the results were very different than the first ABR. The first ABR showed his right ear to almost be normal hearing, whereas on the second test it showed it to be worse overall than the left.
He got his hearing aids a month later and has worn them ever since. I have always been so confused about this entire situation, though, because of the differences in tests (even our parental adviser thought there was too great of a difference from the first). Of course, the logical explanation would be that his loss had progressed, but I was always confused by that because he passed the OAE the day before he had the second ABR. And he had passed another OAE a few weeks prior to that. So, he has passed OAEs and has two different ABR results...
We are now getting a third audiologist to perform an ABR and see what we get. I would have a much easier time accepting all of this if his results MATCHED or at least were very similar, but the two ABRs had up to 25 dB differences...and then the OAEs. I know it is possible to pass an OAE and fail an ABR, but my prior audiologist said it would be impossible for him to have a 60 dB loss and pass an OAE...oh, really...????? Because he did! She didn't know he had because she wasn't the one who performed it.
Anyways, I LOVE my little boy and have been very proactive in helping him. I just want him to get the best care possible. He has been wearing his hearing aids now for 4 months, and he seems to be developing normally. Makes dada, mama, neh neh, gih gih, lala, puh sounds, etc.
I felt compelled to introduce myself because I read some posts here where people said their parents had always taken their hearing aids off in pix. I think that is terrible! I NEVER take my son's aids off for pix. I mean, sure, it may be "better" aesthetically from a vain society's standpoint not to have them in the pix, but they are something he needs! I would never want him to wonder why we took something he needed from him for a picture...that's like taking a person out of a wheelchair for a picture...
Any input anyone has as to the weirdness of my son's tests is appreciated as well....here is a pic of Grayson!