jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 22
Do I correctly understand that this postulates the presumed hearing culture is based on the act of using language rather than any particular language?
I'm not an anthropology student, just a fan of studying society, but it seems to me that members of a group have to be aware of their membership in a group, don't they? A black person knows they are black every day, a deaf person knows they are deaf every day. But hearing people don't think about their hearing until they meet a deaf person. Most people don't walk around all day aware of the fact that they can hear...it just IS for them. I'm not saying this to disprove the idea of a hearing culture, just throwing it out there to point out hearing people are not usually (proudly) Hearing in the way that people are Black or Deaf. They just don't think about it.
Good thoughts, but not being conscious of your cultural affiliation all the time is not unusual at all, expecially for any majority culture. They are accomustomed to the priviledge, born into it, so to speak (no pun intended), and therefore, it is taken for granted under most circumstances. But that doesn't mean the culture doesn't exist.
Gender is another group that people belong to, but you don't spend much conscious time considering whether you are male or female, unless you have GID, which is a whole 'nother topic.
It is the use of spoken language that is associated with hearing culture. The use of language, in whatever mode (signed or spoken), to communicate the abstract and for social interaction, is what makes deaf and hearing alike a part of the larger cultural group known as humans.