- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 11,162
- Reaction score
- 1
FINALLY! you did!!! yayayaya![]()
![]()
YEA YEAH YEA BUT HOW DO PUT IT IN MY EDIT SIGNATURE?? UMMM???
FINALLY! you did!!! yayayaya![]()
![]()
You can't put a video in your signature.YEA YEAH YEA BUT HOW DO PUT IT IN MY EDIT SIGNATURE?? UMMM???
You can't put a video in your signature.
You're probably referring to animated GIF. What they did was convert a video into an animated GIF. There are size restrictions as well.curious why?? cuz i see another has video in signature![]()
![]()
YEA YEAH YEA BUT HOW DO PUT IT IN MY EDIT SIGNATURE?? UMMM???
Need more light to your face... i only saw your long hair... cannot see your face...
Yeah, it's cute... but can be annoying to add graphical artwork to your videos or pictures.really i can see my face?? SO guess need redo video??!!!
its hard cuz its must short video so can with website?? also i am not computer person!!!
Thanks
Where?One of Ader did nice does favor for me change to .Gif.. Then I did try download in my signature and still problem another>>. ..
"You may not upload animated images."??? what is it??
Thanks so much
What are you trying to do? Are you using the attachment feature?Oops yeah its uploadremma I am not computer person heh..
![]()
Yeah after upload then "You may not upload animated images" ??![]()
That's right... unless she is trying to upload it elsewhere?GIF animated will not upload.
![]()
Okay, I see your signature... but it's 132 frames long. 132 frames is too many. The image is nearly 1 MB. That's not good.
Is that the image you want? It looks like you're just fixing your webcam or something.
Why not something of you waving or saying "hi"?
Okay, I took the liberty of reviewing your animated image. Here are the problems...
1.) There are 132 frames at 3/100th of a second each. That's too many frames.
2.) Upon closer review, I noticed that every 2 frames are the same... 1 & 2, 3 & 4, 5 & 6, etc. Meaning, you're doubling your frames... doubling your memory size.
3.) The image was saved in "exact" coloring instead of "websnap adaptive" coloring. Not all web browsers can play all colors well. "Websnap Adaptive" is usually less than 256 colors instead of a million colors.
So, I fixed the image by doing the following...
1.) I removed every 2nd frame so that it's 66 frames instead of 132.
2.) I changed the first frame from 4 seconds to 1 second.
3.) I changed the remaining frames to 6/100th of a second. It was 3/100th of a second for each frame and you had double frames. So, two same frames at 3/100th of a second each equals 1 frame of 6/100th of a second each.
4.) I changed the coloring to 64 colors.
Result?
Before: 870 KB
After: 151 KB
So, email me or IM me for the image I fixed up.![]()