Government to School Kids: Say Bye Bye to Baked Sales

yizuman

Active Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,344
Reaction score
2
4583173.jpg
WASHINGTON (AP) - Don't touch my brownies!

A child nutrition bill on its way to President Barack Obama - and championed by the first lady - gives the government power to limit school bake sales and other fundraisers that health advocates say sometimes replace wholesome meals in the lunchroom.

Republicans, notably Sarah Palin, and public school organizations decry the bill as an unnecessary intrusion on a common practice often used to raise money.

"This could be a real train wreck for school districts," Lucy Gettman of the National School Boards Association said Friday, a day after the House cleared the bill. "The federal government should not be in the business of regulating this kind of activity at the local level."

The legislation, part of first lady Michelle Obama's campaign to stem childhood obesity, provides more meals at school for needy kids, including dinner, and directs the Agriculture Department to write guidelines to make those meals healthier. The legislation would apply to all foods sold in schools during regular class hours, including in the cafeteria line, vending machines and at fundraisers.

It wouldn't apply to after-hours events or concession stands at sports events.

Public health groups pushed for the language on fundraisers, which encourages the secretary of Agriculture to allow them only if they are infrequent. The language is broad enough that a president's administration could even ban bake sales, but Secretary Tom Vilsack signaled in a letter to House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., this week that he does not intend to do that. The USDA has a year to write rules that decide how frequent is infrequent.

Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest says the bill is aimed at curbing daily or weekly bake sales or pizza fundraisers that become a regular part of kids' lunchtime routines. She says selling junk food can easily be substituted with nonfood fundraisers.

"These fundraisers are happening all the time," Wootan said. "It's a pizza sale one day, doughnuts the next... It's endless. This is really about supporting parental choice. Most parents don't want their kids to use their lunch money to buy junk food. They expect they'll use their lunch money to buy a balanced school meal."

Not all see it that way.

Palin mocked the efforts last month by bringing a plate of cookies to a school speech in Pennsylvania. Rep. John Kline of Minnesota, the senior Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee, said the federal government "has really gone too far" when it is deciding when to hold bake sales.

Some parents say they are perplexed by what the new rules might allow.

In Seminole, Fla., the Seminole High Warhawks Marching Band's booster club held a bake sale to help send the band's 173 members to this year's Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade in New York. One of the bake sale's specialties: New York-style cheesecake, an homage to the destination they'd pursued for 10 years.

"Limiting bake sales is so narrow-minded," said Laura Shortway, whose 17-year-old daughter, Mallory, is a drummer in the band. "Having bake sales keeps these fundraisers community based, which is very appealing to the person making the purchase."

Several school districts and state education departments already have policies suggesting or enforcing limits on bake sales, both for nutritional reasons and to keep the events from competing for dollars against school cafeterias. In Connecticut, for instance, about 70 percent of the state's school districts have signed on to the state education department's voluntary guidelines encouraging healthy foods in place of high-sugar, high-fat options.

Under those rules, bake sales cannot be held on school grounds unless the items meet nutrition standards that specifically limit portion sizes, fat content, sodium and sugars. That two-ounce, low-fat granola bar? Probably OK, depending what's in it. But grandma's homemade oversized brownie with cream cheese frosting and chocolate chips inside? Probably not.

One loophole in Connecticut: The nutritional standards apply if the food is being sold at a bake sale, but not if it's being given away free, such as by a parent for a child's birthday.

"If a mom wants to send in cupcakes to celebrate St. Patrick's Day, that would not be subject to the state guidelines," said Thomas Murphy, a spokesman for the state's education department.

In New York City, a rule enacted in 2009 allows bake sales only once a month, and they must comply with nutritional standards and be part of a parent group fundraiser.

Wootan says she hopes the rules will prompt schools to try different options for fundraising.

"Schools are so used to doing the same fundraisers every year that they need a strong nudge to do something new," she says. "The most important rebuttal to all of these arguments is that schools can make money other ways - you don't have to harm kids health."

Source: WLS-AM 890
 
Federal government should not be regulating at local levels. This is ridiculous. That's telling the parents how to raise their kids with what they eat.
 
some schools made rules too. Like my kids' school don't allow to bring homemade cakes for kids birthday. cake or cupcakes must be bought at the store that is allowed for kids birthday at school. sad.
 
Reminds me of the Happy Meal bans. A bit of overkill here.
 
It may sound like overkill but take in mind of the dietary allergies a lot of people have ie peanut, dairy and/or need to follow a gluten-free diet.

It's not just because the government asserts a "nutritional" diet, it's also for health reasons as well.

In Connecticut, for instance, about 70 percent of the state's school districts have signed on to the state education department's voluntary guidelines encouraging healthy foods in place of high-sugar, high-fat options.
 
It may sound like overkill but take in mind of the dietary allergies a lot of people have ie peanut, dairy and/or need to follow a gluten-free diet.

It's not just because the government asserts a "nutritional" diet, it's also for health reasons as well.

it's people's choice to eat unhealthy stuff. people with allergy and/or gluten-free needs know better enough to not buy cookies from school kids' baked sales anyway.

sad that government has to tell us what to do cuz we can't think for ourselves.
 
Wirelessly posted

Jiro said:
Mrs Bucket said:
It may sound like overkill but take in mind of the dietary allergies a lot of people have ie peanut, dairy and/or need to follow a gluten-free diet.

It's not just because the government asserts a "nutritional" diet, it's also for health reasons as well.

it's people's choice to eat unhealthy stuff. people with allergy and/or gluten-free needs know better enough to not buy cookies from school kids' baked sales anyway.

sad that government has to tell us what to do cuz we can't think for ourselves.

Actually, it isn't about eating food with peanut. Many children have been hospitalized because someone had sticky peanut butter on their fingers and touched them with it. To them, its like serving poison ivy but worst.
 
Last edited:
it's people's choice to eat unhealthy stuff. people with allergy and/or gluten-free needs know better enough to not buy cookies from school kids' baked sales anyway.

sad that government has to tell us what to do cuz we can't think for ourselves.

Children are not able to decide which is healthy for them yet unless their parents explain to them. You ask a child which they prefer...

cupcake_lgl.jpg


or

apple.jpg


A rare study that tracked thousands of children through adulthood found the heaviest youngsters were more than twice as likely as the thinnest to die prematurely, before age 55, of illness or a self-inflicted injury.
source
 
Children are not able to decide which is healthy for them yet unless their parents explain to them. You ask a child which they prefer...

cupcake_lgl.jpg


or

apple.jpg


source

they don't get fat or unhealthy from just one cupcake.
 
It may sound like overkill but take in mind of the dietary allergies a lot of people have ie peanut, dairy and/or need to follow a gluten-free diet.

It's not just because the government asserts a "nutritional" diet, it's also for health reasons as well.
The reasons behind it might be sound but that shouldn't be a Federal government responsibility. Let the local schools decide. The student population of each school is different.
 
Wirelessly posted



Actually, it isn't about eating food with peanut. Many children have been hospitalized because someone had sticky peanut butter on their fingers and touched them with it.

You are correct. From touching to breathing as it is airborne, peanut oil can be toxic to some people.

Peanut butter is banned in some Canadian daycares and I googled up peanut butter in USA & came across this very interesting article. Worth the read!

Peanut butter ban sparks ally - article
 
You are correct. From touching to breathing as it is airborne, peanut oil can be toxic to some people.

Peanut butter is banned in some Canadian daycares and I googled up peanut butter in USA & came across this very interesting article. Worth the read!

Peanut butter ban sparks ally - article

that means we should ban peanut butter in America. sad.
 
they don't get fat or unhealthy from just one cupcake.

Granted Jiro, they don't. It is the logic behind it. Sugar and a lot of it.

The reasons behind it might be sound but that shouldn't be a Federal government responsibility. Let the local schools decide. The student population of each school is different.

This I agree with because each school municipality is different. This is where parents and teachers can use this advantage to teach nutrition at a very much younger age.
 
Wirelessly posted

Peanut oil usually don't cause allergy.some kids can eat food cooked in peanut oil while they can't eat peanut. Its the protein in peanut .
 
not necessarily. the parents can reduce the amount of sugar.

Until the kids go to school and their peers share snacks with them.

Parents can't be everywhere with their kids 24/7. Kids will go to the dime store and get penny candies (if they still have it these days!)
 
It may sound like overkill but take in mind of the dietary allergies a lot of people have ie peanut, dairy and/or need to follow a gluten-free diet.

It's not just because the government asserts a "nutritional" diet, it's also for health reasons as well.

I know in the school my kids were in for a while, they provided a list to the parents at the beginning of the year and then updated lists as the need came up, of any child who had a specific allergy or dietary ban. In my daughter's case, she was not allowed to have dairy. She also had 7 classmates that had peanut allergies. On this list were also notations if the kids could not participate in parties or such due to religion. (Jehovah's Witness being one). Son had 3 in his class. In that case, we would just arrange with the teacher for a hands on cooking lesson. The kids learned to bake cookies, or make something and then everyone got to eat. It made the children who were left out able to be included. That way, it wasn't a birthday party, it was part of the lesson. For the class that couldn't have the peanuts or dairy or gluten, we did fruit platters. That always went over well. I would slice watermelon, then cut it out with cookie cutters. Kids loved eating the watermelon dinosaurs. :giggle:
 
Peanut butter is banned at my son's daycare.

At my work, we have a table that is peanut butter free.

Things are changing, that's for sure.
 
I wonder why so many kids have peanut allergies these days? It seems to be increasing.
 
I wonder why so many kids have peanut allergies these days? It seems to be increasing.

I was thinking the same thing. I never recalled anything like a "peanut butter free" area. What the heck is that???
 
Back
Top