Gone with the old, here comes with the new...

A

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
1
yep, Some of your CI are being outdated, here comes the new and improve CI . here's why:

Media-Newswire.com - Press Release Distribution - PR Agency

Media-Newswire.com) - AUGUSTA, GA. – More electrodes and a thinner, more flexible wire inserted further into the inner ear could improve conventional cochlear implants, a team of Medical College of Georgia and Georgia Institute of Technology researchers say.

Candidates for cochlear implants—an estimated million in the United States alone—include children and adults with profound deafness in both ears. An implant does not restore normal hearing but simulates sounds in the environment, including speech. More electrodes pick up more external sound and the flexible wire allows those sounds to be transmitted over more of the auditory nerves.

Researchers will present their findings about the new device at the 11th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Auditory Implantable Technology in Stockholm, Sweden June 30 – July 3.

The snail-shaped cochlea is difficult to access, particularly considering the multiple components involved in a cochlear implant, said Dr. Brian McKinnon, assistant professor of neurotology/otology in the Department of Otolaryngology in the MCG School of Medicine. Those components include of an external microphone, speech processor and transmitter and an internal group of electrodes arranged on a thin wire that stimulate the auditory nerve.

“The wire in traditional implants is fragile and thin and may buckle,” he said. “We try to get it as far into the center of the cochlea, where the nerves are bundled, as possible – the idea being that the more electrodes on the nerves, the better the sound.”

Because they buckle, physicians typically can’t optimally insert the wire, and electrodes can, in some cases, injure the cochlea, he said.

The new device, called the thin film array, pairs 12 electrodes on a thinner, more flexible wire. The wire’s thinness has, so far, allowed surgeons to place more electrodes into the cochlea than they could with a conventional electrode. With more electrodes than standard models, the implant improves the quality of sound.

The array was developed in the Biosystems Interface Laboratory at the Georgia Institute of Technology by Assistant Professor Pamela Bhatti, a biomedical engineer, and Georgia Tech student Jessica Falcone. McKinnon and Dr. Kenneth Iverson, a third-year otolaryngology resident, tested it on cadaver models

“This device could mean could mean a several-fold improvement of the sound’s resolution,” Iverson said. “For the patient, it would be like the difference between hearing a Bach concerto played by a music box versus a quartet.”

McKinnon compared the improvement to adding more fingers and more notes to a piano performance.

There are other benefits too.

“Because the thinner wire means less trauma to the ear, it could also mean more preservation of residual hearing for patients,” Iverson said.
 
Yeah, but it is going to be years and years before those go to clinical trials and then more years until they are FDA approved. No need to start yanking out devices yet :giggle:
 
I don't think they would yank it.. they probably just compare your old implanted child to the new implanted child. And say, The new implanted child have more success.
 
I don't think they would yank it.. they probably just compare your old implanted child to the new implanted child. And say, The new implanted child have more success.

Yeah, the kids getting their implants in 25 years will do better than the kids today....yep, that what technology does

Though the likelyhood that my daughter will go to the grave with the internal device that she has now is really next to zero, so she should get to benefit from the advances as well.
 
That's is just as bad as comparing ASL deaf to Oral deaf.
 
Let's put it this way, my sister and I have always compare to each other who could speak, write, or hear better... but it all rooted to hearing technology and hearing loss.

Another example of two sisters, one had her implant late and had an older implant. The other sister had a newer implant and was implanted early. Everyone was at awe at the new sister because she sounded more "hearing" than the older sister. The older sister wished she was implanted early too and that the technology exist back then. I could tell she feel alittle discouraged when she wrote that.

In ASL vs. Oral, From what I'm reading, people think oralism is more successful than ASL. But really, they don't make a big difference. It all depend on the person and how they make themselves useful.
 
hmm..i don't think you guys are on the same page lol...faire is saying she is ok with advanced tech even if her child doesnt have it but wants it later..and ur saying thats bad? I'm also kinda confused as to why you're relating this to ASL vs oral...
 
I tried to google to get a picture what does it look like now but couldnt find it yet. I will need to search more for it after work.
 
I can undy from A's point of view. Many of us were raised with the view that being able to hear and speak better equates a better life/more happiness.
 
I tried to google to get a picture what does it look like now but couldnt find it yet. I will need to search more for it after work.

It's still purely research at this moment. They haven't even tested it in live people yet. It said that they have only used it in cadavers. It won't be out for a long time.
 
hmm..i don't think you guys are on the same page lol...faire is saying she is ok with advanced tech even if her child doesnt have it but wants it later..and ur saying thats bad? I'm also kinda confused as to why you're relating this to ASL vs oral...

I'm confused too...
 
You both probably are confused because you probably werent subjected to this kind of view growing up.
 
It's still purely research at this moment. They haven't even tested it in live people yet. It said that they have only used it in cadavers. It won't be out for a long time.

Yes. I know.. just wonder if they have "blue print" to show how or what they are planning on, look like somewhere on online sites.
 
I can undy from A's point of view. Many of us were raised with the view that being able to hear and speak better equates a better life/more happiness.

exactly...

Just like my inlaw tell a deaf guy how great CI is. I don't think he would have brought up CI if he wasn't comparing this deaf guy's hearing and his choice of technology (hearing aids) to my hearing with CI. It didn't matter he have a business for himself. I felt he was doing just fine with HAs, in fact I was really impress that he could do business using LESS hearing than me. but some people have this idea that the more the better.

Also, when you are child, you do speech based on the technology quality, people end up not liking what they hearing so they compare to HA deaf people (as an "oh.. she sound too deaf!") to CI deaf kids and they like the way CI deaf kids sound like. pretty soon, they will compare to older CI kids with the new CI kids and same thing will happen ("oh, she sound too deaf" ) Then when we try to teach them a thing or two about audism or how we were raised, they brush it off by saying "that will never happen because the technology is better". How do you think the child feel when people are more impress with success of other children because of "better" technology ? Never mind if a person can be reimplanted or not.

oh I brought up ASL because I think it is just as bad. It's terrible for people to look at their background and say "it isn't good enough".
 
Last edited:
no one ever said any one had to get CI in this thread or oral was better than ASL ...the OP pointed out new technology and faire just said that it was good to be able to have new things in the future..what does any of that have to do with oral vs ASL...it's technology advancements! no one ever said being able to hear is the end all be all the thread is going the wrong way because of something that shouldn't have even been relevant to the thread..the thread is about a technology advancement for those seeking CI's or for those who have CI's now and maybe would like a new implant in the future no one ever said "Every Deaf person needs a CI to be happy"...
 
Back
Top