DeafCaroline
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2007
- Messages
- 4,889
- Reaction score
- 19
... and not to mention that his personal life isn't that pretty either. Neither is his political career. After all, he did get fined $300,000 for unethical conduct. Isn't it also true that he was forced out the the party to avoid any more embarrassment? I remember they started doing an investigation on dozens and dozens of crimes that were alleged, however they never were turned over to the DOJ.
Gingrich Credits Freddie/Fannie For Liquid, Stable Housing Finance System | Judicial Watch
Nowadays, Gingrich said he was paid to give advice to Freddie Mac which was to stop giving loans to those who were not qualified. However, that's not what he said BEFORE the collapse.
"A California-based news blog managed to dig up the speech from the Freddie Mac archives this week. Gingrich actually says the housing GSEs have made an “important contribution to homeownership and the housing finance system” and that they are responsible for a more “liquid and stable housing finance system than we would have without the GSEs.”
He adds that making home ownership more accessible and affordable is a policy goal that conservatives should embrace and says that these are “examples of government bringing about desired public purpose without creating massive, taxpayer-funded bureaucracies.” This is a “pragmatic and effective conservative approach,” according to Gingrich. That was 2007. In 2008, under pressure from the collapse of the subprime mortgage market that was largely created by Fannie and Freddie – the two “GSEs” were placed in conservatorship by the federal government. Since then, taxpayers have spent nearly $95 billion propping up Fannie Mae and over $57 billion propping up Freddie Mac."
And this quote is direct from Freddie Mac themselves in an interview called "Poiicy Talks - Q&A", published April 2007
Market-Based Models Are Key to Transforming U.S. Government to a 21st Century Organization - Freddie Mac
Gingrich: "Certainly there is a lot of debate today about the housing GSEs, but I think it is telling that there is strong bipartisan support for maintaining the GSE model in housing. There is not much support for the idea of removing the GSE charters from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. And I think it's clear why. The housing GSEs have made an important contribution to homeownership and the housing finance system. We have a much more liquid and stable housing finance system than we would have without the GSEs. "
He was paid 1.6 million by Freddie Mac by the way.