GingRICH

Status
Not open for further replies.
But ... but ... but ... that is his calling sign. It's expected of him!!! When else have we ever seen anything other than mind-numbing nonsense?

:laugh2:
 

nice try but -

According to your source -
A tax expert hired by the House Ethics Committee said the course violated tax laws, and in 1997 Gingrich agreed to pay a $300,000 fine for making misleading statements to the ethics panel and failing to seek better legal advice before using tax-exempt money for the course.

and

Washingtonpost.com: Ethics Committee Drops Last of 84 Ethics Charges Against Gingrich
The House ethics committee dropped the three remaining ethics charges against Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) yesterday, despite finding that Gingrich repeatedly violated one rule by using a political consultant to develop the Republican legislative agenda.

A third allegation that Gingrich benefited personally from $250,000 in GOPAC "Newt Support" and should have reported it as income for federal tax purposes was also dropped by the ethics committee for lack of evidence.

and we both know that despite of lack of evidence, Gingrich is continuing to do shady financial dealings because it's simply how it is at the hill. it's just a matter of time till karma catches up with him.
 
nice try but -

According to your source -


and

Washingtonpost.com: Ethics Committee Drops Last of 84 Ethics Charges Against Gingrich




and we both know that despite of lack of evidence, Gingrich is continuing to do shady financial dealings because it's simply how it is at the hill. it's just a matter of time till karma catches up with him.

*shrug* IRS says the House Committee was wrong. 84 ethics charges brought....83 dropped. 1 settled and then cleared by the IRS.
 
*shrug* IRS says the House Committee was wrong. 84 ethics charges brought....83 dropped. 1 settled and then cleared by the IRS.

sure. life's that simple. :dunno:
 
:shrug:

If it was just one or two allegations and charges against Newt...would be easy to brush off or dismiss but he has a looooong history of having allegations and charges made against him in regards to financial dealings, kinda hard to ignore all of that history especially when something new keeps popping up.

One blogger had a theory the reason Newt did well in SC and Florida is because evangelicals and religious groups love a redemption story.

Anyway, he will never be President, yay!
 
:shrug:

If it was just one or two allegations and charges against Newt...would be easy to brush off or dismiss but he has a looooong history of having allegations and charges made against him in regards to financial dealings, kinda hard to ignore all of that history especially when something new keeps popping up.

One blogger had a theory the reason Newt did well in SC and Florida is because evangelicals and religious groups love a redemption story.

Anyway, he will never be President, yay!

:dunno: Let me know what the blogger says about his surge elsewhere.
 
:shrug:

If it was just one or two allegations and charges against Newt...would be easy to brush off or dismiss but he has a looooong history of having allegations and charges made against him in regards to financial dealings, kinda hard to ignore all of that history especially when something new keeps popping up.

One blogger had a theory the reason Newt did well in SC and Florida is because evangelicals and religious groups love a redemption story.

Anyway, he will never be President, yay!

and it's also comical that one is unaware of how extraordinary difficult it is to investigate white collar crime and that this kind of shady financial dealings happens all the time in White House and Wall Street. Or perhaps one simply chose to be conveniently obtuse about it.

I find it extremely puzzling as to why would one vote for someone with shady financial dealings when one is very concerned about our current state of financial affairs? :dunno2:

we've seen what happened under Bush Administration and tens of billions of dollars were unaccounted for in war spending. There were outrages over unnecessarily high spending toward to private companies.

I guess ignorance is indeed truly a bliss.
 
and it's also comical that one is unaware of how extraordinary difficult it is to investigate white collar crime and that this kind of shady financial dealings happens all the time in White House and Wall Street. Or perhaps one simply chose to be conveniently obtuse about it.

I find it extremely puzzling as to why would one vote for someone with shady financial dealings when one is very concerned about our current state of financial affairs? :dunno2:

we've seen what happened under Bush Administration and tens of billions of dollars were unaccounted for in war spending. There were outrages over unnecessarily high spending toward to private companies.

I guess ignorance is indeed truly a bliss.

Interesting.
 
What did you expect coming from a thread that was started on falsehood?

All you're doing is heckling around with same message. I'm going to have to ask you to kindly leave this thread unless you have something to contribute to this thread. And you are free to PM mods if you have a problem with this thread.
 
and it's also comical that one is unaware of how extraordinary difficult it is to investigate white collar crime and that this kind of shady financial dealings happens all the time in White House and Wall Street. Or perhaps one simply chose to be conveniently obtuse about it.

I find it extremely puzzling as to why would one vote for someone with shady financial dealings when one is very concerned about our current state of financial affairs? :dunno2:

we've seen what happened under Bush Administration and tens of billions of dollars were unaccounted for in war spending. There were outrages over unnecessarily high spending toward to private companies.

I guess ignorance is indeed truly a bliss.

Exactly. When such charges keep cropping up re one man, it's time to reconsider him even if you're on the same page as him.
 
All you're doing is heckling around with same message. I'm going to have to ask you to kindly leave this thread unless you have something to contribute to this thread. And you are free to PM mods if you have a problem with this thread.



This is a thread based on MONEY LAUNDERING, started by you. And, as of yet, you have not proved your point. You have allow it to go way off-topic in an attempt to distract from your responsiblity to all AD members, not just Alex and/or the mods. If you have a problem with me, feel free to report me to Alex and/or the mods.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top