Gays to lie on their blood donation application

TrippLA said:
Gay Power, Black Power, Latino Power... Remember about what MLK said... They can have free speech about any rights and never against on other people that who is gay.
Click to expand...

You have a good point.

Also, Heath is christian person. He should know better because God said, dont judge on people, they cant do that. Only Jesus and God can do that period.
 
Type O blood is type O blood. It doesn't matter if it's from a gay person or not as long as its clean. Red blood cells are the same regardless of who they are from as they're dead anyway.
 
Teresh said:
Type O blood is type O blood. It doesn't matter if it's from a gay person or not as long as its clean. Red blood cells are the same regardless of who they are from as they're dead anyway.
Click to expand...

Agree... That's damn right. :)
 
Teresh said:
Type O blood is type O blood. It doesn't matter if it's from a gay person or not as long as its clean. Red blood cells are the same regardless of who they are from as they're dead anyway.
Click to expand...

You are right. :thumb:
 
Sweetheart said:
You have a good point.

Also, Heath is christian person. He should know better because God said, dont judge on people, they cant do that. Only Jesus and God can do that period.
Click to expand...

Yea, I know that people in South, known as bible belt. They are write on bible, that against on anything, not support to be wild and other stuff. Only few of my families from South, especially in Atlanta, DC (who knows if it part of South and Miami. Miami is liberal and bible-free, most Cubans are considered be conservative, it means not involving with christian related.

Note: I'm apologize for said bad thing about your boyfriend, just feel free to talk via PM but thanks to moderator for deleted my post in one thread that discuss about admit stuff because I cannot edit.
 
Same thing happens at plasma donation centers. They don't accept people who are gay/lesbain, either. I've heard of my friend who was rejected because of that. That's ridicilous because they don't even have HIV and they're clean. I think it's those people who are homophobia. The worker at the plasma donation place agrees with me the policy of theirs is dumb. He had to follow their policy, not much he can do about it. Hetrosexual people do get HIV too.
 
sequoias said:
Same thing happens at plasma donation centers. They don't accept people who are gay/lesbain, either. I've heard of my friend who was rejected because of that. That's ridicilous because they don't even have HIV and they're clean. I think it's those people who are homophobia. The worker at the plasma donation place agrees with me the policy of theirs is dumb. He had to follow their policy, not much he can do about it. Hetrosexual people do get HIV too.
Click to expand...

I agree, How about blood donation? I haven't take it.
 
I doubt that new bills that means ban people to be become gay, rainbow flags and activities like at gay village or gay neighborhood would pass. Bush had nothing to do with that. For like civil rights, everyone have rights to be gay or lebsian because of comfortable with sex personal. That will be very very very stupid if already pass it and make USA looks worst developed country on the earth. Protest against new immigration laws are very messed up with life like crowded as big ants on street, some roads are closed, limited driving around here, drivers would be stuck up on roads and too many signs. It would be happen with gay people that protest against new bills, not happen in anytime. One senator from WI is moron and don't care if getting big mess like protest or everything.
 
netrox said:
The majority of AIDS population is BLACK so why don't you start banning blacks from donating blood?
Click to expand...


That's true. :)
 
Actually, Black and White blood was gathered separately in the US until the second world war, and it raises an interesting point to look back on the ridiculousness of that decision. I am a blood donor, and as a lesbian I am not disqualified because in Canada any woman can give blood as long as they havent had sex with a man who has had sex with a man since 1977. Men can give blood if they havent had sex with men, and no one is permitted to give blood if they have used needles or slept with those who have. What is really interesting though is that it doesnt matter about condom use. The laws focus too much on identity and not enough on behavior. For example, I could have unprotected sex with a man and give blood, but if I had safe sex with a bisexual man, I would be banned. The fact is that safe sex with anyone, be they straight, bi or gay, is safer than unprotected sex with anyone and the blood banks should know this. There are plenty of younger gay men who have only ever had safe sex and only ever will because AIDS has always loomed in their lives. Their blood has nothing wrong with it and should be accepted. period.
 
Heath this is great. thanks for posting this thread! You really show how ignorant you are. As some have said it is a subculture that are like that. IN FACT for a gay man to have unprotected sex is becoming taboo. Their friends yell at them for being so stupid. And to be sleeping around is so 1970's. people now look at it as something bad. You go from man to man to man... You are dirty get away from me. My brother died because of AIDS he suffered greatly and it is nothing to make light of.
You show your ignorance yet again by throwing God in the mix. I can only assume from your comments that you feel the bible is the truth cover to cover. Okay well lets go with that.
1, The bible say God is love. If he is love he cannot hate people.
2, God is the same yesterday today and forever. Well if you will flip threw your bible you will see that it says for a man to lay with another man it is an abomination. The act is what causes the problem not the person. ALSO it says that to eat shell fish is an abomination in Gods eyes. Have you ever eaten Shrimp, clams, crab, lobster, crawfish? Well then you yourself have commited an abomination in God's eyes. You are right there with me Heath.
3 i know you will be great and use Sodom and Gamorah being destroyed as your reason for God hating gays. IF YOU WOULD READ THE BIBLE there were 5 cities of the plain that God destroyed that day not just those two. All God said is because they were wicked. NO OTHER REASON. The fact that the men in the city wanted to have sex with the angels is not why. He was going to destroy the cities to begin with. GOD NEVER STATES I WILL DESTROY THEM FOR BEING HOMOSEXUALS.
4 If God destroyed those cities for that reason and he never changes why did he not destroy ancient Rome and ancient Greece? They were known for being extremely gay cultures. Most religous people say it was after homos perverted the culture that it fell. That is wrong. Rome was gay when it was founded and it lasted nearly 1,000 years. Okay so it was a really really really long fall. It fell after converting to christianity. hmmmmmmm
3 Lets look at Jesus who you claim to love. Zacius the tax collector hated by the religious people Jesus went to his house and ate with him. The Samaritan woman. The Jews of that day, of which Jesus was one, hated the people of Samaria Jesus went out of his way to go to this city and help this woman. The woman with the issue of blood. She touched the hem of his garmet and was made whole. Because Jesus was a Rabbi the woman should have been killed. Jesus healed her and sent her to live her life. The 5 leapors who go through the world ringing bells and crying unclean. Jesus touched them. Shall i go on and on and on?
Jesus went to these hated people and had no problem no hatred. Christ never taught to hate anyone. The bible also says they were first called Christians at Antioch because they were Christ like. That would mean that to call yourself that you would have to act in every way like him. This post and your attitude shows that you are not Christ like.
A gay with an extensive knowledge of the bible what IS the world coming to? LMAO!!!!
 
Back
Top