Gardasil

Should the vaccine be mandatory?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • No

    Votes: 5 55.6%
  • Only in certain situations ( explain)

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • Total voters
    9

Lil_country_gal

New Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
2,332
Reaction score
0
Have you guys heard of the Vaccine Gardasil it's suppose to protect against strains of HPV which may cause cervical cancer. I was wondering if anyone had gotten it and what your reaction was to it?

Also they are contimplating wethier it should be a mandatory vaccine for all high school girls. Do you think they should or shouldn't make it so it's mandatory and what are your thoughts on that?
 
I've heard about it. My daughter hasn't got it yet. She'll be seeing her doctor in couple of months for her annual routine check-up. I'm going to talk to her doctor about it. My daughter will be 16 in June. I think it's time for her first pap smear test. It wouldn't hurt. I had my first pap smear same as she. There's no history of my mother's side of cervical cancer.
 
Absolutely not. There's so many factors that go into this. Many doctors are choosing not to carry gardasil because of it's sheer cost- it's expensive, very much so. Second, by making it mandatory, it's taking away the family and -girls- choice in their sexual activity, and essentially saying "well, society expects you to be having sex anyways, so lets give you this vaccine which will offer a false sense of security" Teens are so rarely educated about sex, and that needs to come first- my cousin was dead convinced that giving a blow job could make her pregnant, but never considered an STD.

From the side that doesn't include the morals, the vaccine itself is, at best, questionable. The efficacy of gardasil in 9- to 15-year-old girls is inferred. We do not know how -long- gardasil works, as it's only been studied for 2-4 years. In theory, a 16 year old girl could then be at risk for HPV if she got the vaccine at 9. We don't yet have the long-term information.
Within the 2-4 year period, it was not effective in preventing all cases of cervical dysplasia or genital warts. Gardasil did have some nasty side affects for a "favorable" amount of people. Yes, that does mean they're fairly uncommon, but -someone- has to be in the unfortunate 10%.


gardasil can be a good choice for some women, and it certainly has alot it can be praised for thus far. However, it has many downsides and that's why I feel it has no place being mandatory in schools- if a girl shouldn't be at risk of transmitting it at school (ie, having sex there), then there is absolutely no reason for her to have to get it to -be in school-.
 
I am on the "NO" side here. It has a high cost, and there are many families that cannot afford this added expense. With that in mind, I am sure the school districts will be extending the empty hand and begging for more money to dump into the black hole called Public Schools Budgets, where the dollars are never enough, and there is no accountability. I have nothing against education, but am tired of the constant droning of the money machine they have.
 
The uproar coming out of mandatory Gardasil vaccinations is going to be the same as if schools were handing out free condoms.

Richard
 
Back
Top