thewinterknight said:
Actually, the part about humans being unfathomable is true, for example a man rape a dog, and molested 2 childrens. Let us ask ourselves, why?
If Fate truly existed, would God had intended for innocecnt children to be violated, No. Thus by this Fate's existence is highly doubtful
The problem, however, is that your argument depends on a merciful and benevolent diety who will not allow a child to be raped and has no purpose for it.
Often when something bad happens to us, we say, "God works in mysterious ways." "God has a purpose for it." Following a similar line of thought, you can argue that God had a purpose for a tragic, awful event like that to happen to a child. All of a sudden, the argument against fate you provide has no more base.
Furthermore, with "evil happening to a child" in mind, I also suggest to you the famous Riddle of Epicurus (bear in mind, the Riddle of Epicurus has flaws and you can argue against it):
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Yet, again, you're right about free will having implications but, For example. A man smokes for 10 years and then decides to stop smoking. That is free will. Now some of you may argue that this is not free will because it is determined that the health side-effects was too dangerous to the man.
The Heretic says, "Free will cannot be proven through self-awareness, because sifting through one’s own self-awareness will only locate the illusion of freedom."
The argument you provide is doing just that, it uses a certain recognition of "self-awareness" to substantiate free will. A good example of what's going on is like saying, "Johnny is a turtle because Johnny says he's a turtle." If you really look at Johnny, he isn't a turtle. What's happening here is called circular logic.
Here is yet another example of why I believe free will to exist. The non-believer exercise HIS will not to believe in any deity.
What about people who never learn of a deity? In the world famous classic,
The Divine Comedy Dante reminds his reader that the Roman poet Virgil cannot ascend to Heaven because Virgil lived before the time of Christ.
Also, think of a lab rat. If you consistently zap a lab rat with electricity for chasing cheese, invariably the rat will stop chasing cheese. Now apply the example to a child. Let's say someone whips a child every time the child shows faith in God. This goes on for eighteen years. Now is the child's rejection of God really his fault? Is it his free will or has he been preconditioned to hate mention of the deity? You can extend this to so many other things, like peer pressure, social control, etc.