You'll be surprised.
If I ever run into one of them, they'd be surprised!
You'll be surprised.
I am sorry for having doubted you. I should have given you the benefit of the doubt, not the negative aspect. I am known to be blunt at times but it was not my intention to hurt your feelings.
As for that "interpreter," stomp her, stomp her, stomp her!
Don't wait at the last minute like i did when i had problems with my interpreter. call RID NOW! Because if you don't, they won't get rid of her, or him. You need to be able to build up that confidence and say: "I need an qualified interpreter. period. and if you aren't able to do that, we'll discuss this in court." If you have to threaten them, do it. There are some people who are afraid to do that, but we have to be able to stand up for ourselves, i mean in college, our parents aren't going to be able to fight for us because we're going to be adults now. I mean i'm currently 17 years old, and I had to litterally fight for my right when i had problems with my interpreter and when i did, my interpreter resigned, and i got what i needed--and wanted. So, don't be afraid to get a qualified interpreter, you deserve to have one. Plus, its under ADA law too. ADA law states that If they do not give you an qualified interpreter, its basically discriminating you. I've done my research. But I agree with everybody else here. DO.NOT.BE.AFRAID.
plus, screw the interpreter for telling you to voice for yourself. She is not you. You are You. Tell her no! or tell her to stop it. Being straight-forward would be better. Truth is, theres going to be a 50-50 chance that one of you is going to be hurt. Sometimes, hearing the criticize is going to hurt, but it will make you a better person, and that interpreter needs to learn a lesson too.
WOW! well I felt like I was suffering in SILENCE..loL..Anyways I ned to work on my confidence. Yah I know they are human, but I have rights!
50/50 chance? I agree, what was ur situation? Was it the same?
Certified terps generally are paid more. So she turned down a pay raise.It's okay, I need to speak up more. I remember asking her was she certified. I went on to ask her why not. She said that she doesn't want to become certified because you would have to be strict. I think that she doesn't lack the skill to be certified actually. She said she likes to get involved with the students. So, if she was certified she'd have to leave and do strictly interpreting.lol THATS WHAT TERPS R SUPPOSED TO DO! lol :roll:
Your advice is great except for this. RID can't do anything about uncertified interpreters. Certified terps are subject to RID sanction if they violate ethics. Uncertified terps are not. So because these aren't certified, RID can't do anything.Don't wait at the last minute like i did when i had problems with my interpreter. call RID NOW! Because if you don't, they won't get rid of her, or him.
But yeah, I would demand a qualified terp ASAP...and yeah I'm sure she doesn't have the skills to be certified! I have only met a few terps who "didn't want" to be certified and they are mostly snobs without the skills to get certified anyway.
Keep in mind though, the ADA doesn't guarantee you a certified terp, it guarantees you a qualified terp. However, your terps are obviously not qualified. Refusing to use ASL? Demanding you speak? They both need to leave NOW. It doesn't matter what the school has to do to provide you with another one. They are REQUIRED to.
Can I ask where you're located? Like what is your college, or what is the nearest major city (and how far is it)?
I know that the ADA law says qualified. But hearing from what shes saying, her interpreter is not qualified. so therefore, she can have ADA on her side. she deserves a qualified interpreter.
What information would you like? I did try to hint around but she didn't pay attention. I guess straight foward is best.
One thing that I've learned going through a college level interpreting program is that very few decisions in interpreting are black and white. I was just curious what reasons the interpreter had for making the choice she did. Was she being lazy? Did she think she was being genuinely helpful? Did she misunderstand you and think that you wanted to voice for yourself? Was she told by somebody that this is what you wanted?
I personally don't think her choice was the most effective based on the information you have provided, but without knowing all the factors, it's hard for me to say that she was straight-up wrong.
Still, something needs to be done about the situation, because things can't stay as they are. At the very least it sounds like she should receive some basic training in the role and responsibility of an interpreter.
I've used interpreters in different settings, and only once did an interpreter tell me to use my voice. It was in a classroom with a couple other deaf students besides myself. I asked her why she wanted me to voice my questions to the professor, and she said it was because I should not be ashamed of my "beautiful" speech. I told her that I had reasons not to voice and that my consideration for the other two deafies (who had poor speech skills) was just part of it. She was very embarrassed and apologetic and I bet she never asked another deaf student to voice after that. Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should an interpreter ask a deafie to voice. I am quite adamant about that.
There can be a million reasons for not voicing. The interpreter only needs to hear one: "I don't want to."
By the same token, of course, deaf people who do want to voice for themselves should be given the opportunity. However, that does not preclude the terp voicing as well.
I say this because I have encountered deaf people who thought they had intelligible speech, but the hearing person couldn't understand them. The hearing person asked the terp to please voice over the deaf person. Because the terp is there for the hearing person too...if the hearing person cannot understand the deaf person's speech, they have a right to request the terp to voice.
At no time should anybody be forced to use a modality they don't want to, whichever modality that is.
One thing that I've learned going through a college level interpreting program is that very few decisions in interpreting are black and white. I was just curious what reasons the interpreter had for making the choice she did. Was she being lazy? Did she think she was being genuinely helpful? Did she misunderstand you and think that you wanted to voice for yourself? Was she told by somebody that this is what you wanted?
I personally don't think her choice was the most effective based on the information you have provided, but without knowing all the factors, it's hard for me to say that she was straight-up wrong.
Still, something needs to be done about the situation, because things can't stay as they are. At the very least it sounds like she should receive some basic training in the role and responsibility of an interpreter.
Interpreter in training, actually. I hope to graduate this fall.You're an interpreter? cool!
It depends on how they became an interpreter and what qualifications they have. Understand that not everyone who calls them self an interpreter has received formal training or is even aware that such training is necessary to be an effective interpreter. The program I'm attending emphasizes an understanding of Deaf culture and encourages interaction with the local Deaf community as well as extensive study of ethical decision making.Recover5302 said:Well why is it that many interpreters can sign but they don't know much about Deaf culture? I AM SAYING SOME..NOT ALL
Is that part of the interpreting program?