- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 54,899
- Reaction score
- 1,518
If you're referring to the passage in Matthew 7, you aren't quoting it accurately.Back to the topic, what bothers me is that in God's word, WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE?. What does that mean?
The point of that passage was not that Christians couldn't use judgment or discernment. The point was, if a Christian did judge another they should expect to be held to the same standard and judgment. Therefor, a Christian should examine his/her own life and actions first before judging another's. A Christian should then repent of his/her own fault, then be able to judge others.
Also, that is not judgment in the sense of eternal spiritual condemnation but judgment in doing right and wrong actions.
In the cases I've seen so far, the bakers weren't judging people. They simply refused to participate in an activity (same-sex wedding) that went against their consciences.My point is that the bakers should not judge people. When they did, they got death threats. That's their fault because they judged people. Honestly, they asked for it.
They did NOT ask for death threats. There is NO justification for death threats.
If people are offended by the bakers, they can boycott the shop. There is no place for threats of violence of any kind.
It's frightening to see that you think that would be OK.