Feds now back morning-after pills for all girls

Jiro said:
how? they'll be in jail.
Click to expand...
Only if they get turned in. It seems that doesn't happen often enough.

Really, do you see lots of men going to jail for statutory rape anymore?
 
Reba said:
Only if they get turned in. It seems that doesn't happen often enough.

Really, do you see lots of men going to jail for statutory rape anymore?
Click to expand...

there are tons of sex offenders though.
 
Jiro said:
actually I'm talking about entire America.
Click to expand...

Not all regions in America are same - live in between deep south states and NYC/NJ are very unique. Many kids in here are come from religious families and less likely to have sex until teen.
 
By making emergency contraception available to women of all ages, the FDA is taking an important step to reduce unintended pregnancies and put women in control of their futures," Hogue said in a statement.

[...]

The morning-after pill contains a higher dose of the female hormone progestin than is in regular birth control pills. Taking it within 72 hours of rape, condom failure or just forgetting regular contraception can cut the chances of pregnancy by up to 89 percent, but it works best within the first 24 hours. If a girl or woman already is pregnant, the pill, which prevents ovulation or fertilization of an egg, has no effect.
Click to expand...

I think it would be better if it's for 15 and older for those pills, considering 15 years old is old enough, than no age restriction at all. Those pills doesn't cause abortions so often, so I don't see what issue is. If they're 14 and under, then parents (and doctor if needed) should involve and support their teen/pre-teen children.

Well, every generation is still changing, yet sex education is still frowned on. =/

EDIT: Before you throw some screaming "you hate women/you're evil conservative Christian/you're oppose to BCs/etc" bullshits on me, I'm not oppose all of those birth controls and sex education. I'm favor of pro-solutions and I believe both pro-life and pro-choice need to be work together instead of bricking.

Now, relax! (sighs)
 
Jiro said:
that's what sex education is for.
Click to expand...

Sadly, that doesn't work. Something about the teenage mind makes consequence a foreign concept. Besides, a doctor is going yo know much more about the topic than a teacher.
 
TXgolfer said:
Sadly, that doesn't work. Something about the teenage mind makes consequence a foreign concept. Besides, a doctor is going yo know much more about the topic than a teacher.
Click to expand...

Well, sex education is not so prefect but it's better to be informed about body anatomy, how to avoid STDs and pregnancy, and etc. Just because kids are being informed and still got his/her mistake, that doesn't mean sex education should be removed from schools...
 
KarissaMann05 said:
I think it would be better if it's for 15 and older for those pills, considering 15 years old is old enough, than no age restriction at all. Those pills doesn't cause abortions so often, so I don't see what issue is. If they're 14 and under, then parents (and doctor if needed) should involve and support their teen/pre-teen children.

Well, every generation is still changing, yet sex education is still frowned on. =/

EDIT: Before you throw some screaming "you hate women/you're evil conservative Christian/you're oppose to BCs/etc" bullshits on me, I'm not oppose all of those birth controls and sex education. I'm favor of pro-solutions and I believe both pro-life and pro-choice need to be work together instead of bricking.

Now, relax! (sighs)
Click to expand...

Yes but US judges disagree with age restriction. :(

Obama could appeal to US Supreme Court.

No worries - nobody going to misled you.
 
TXgolfer said:
Sadly, that doesn't work. Something about the teenage mind makes consequence a foreign concept. Besides, a doctor is going yo know much more about the topic than a teacher.
Click to expand...

It looks like parents are more lazy today?
 
Foxrac said:
Yes but US judges disagree with age restriction. :(

Obama could appeal to US Supreme Court.

No worries - nobody going to misled you.
Click to expand...

:lol::ty:

Well, yeah, of course. If it comes to birth controls... Sighs.

Foxrac said:
It looks like parents are more lazy today?
Click to expand...

It could be. I believe that it's so uncomfortable for parents to form a discussion with their kids. Really, those parents should have a gut enough to talk about if when kids are old enough before their puberty hit.

I was taught at school and thought that was not really bad at all...
 
Foxrac said:
Not all regions in America are same - live in between deep south states and NYC/NJ are very unique. Many kids in here are come from religious families and less likely to have sex until teen.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid you're wrong.
 
TXgolfer said:
Sadly, that doesn't work. Something about the teenage mind makes consequence a foreign concept. Besides, a doctor is going yo know much more about the topic than a teacher.
Click to expand...

so you want to remove sex education and replace it with abstinence program?
 
KarissaMann05 said:
Well, sex education is not so prefect but it's better to be informed about body anatomy, how to avoid STDs and pregnancy, and etc. Just because kids are being informed and still got his/her mistake, that doesn't mean sex education should be removed from schools...
Click to expand...

I didn't say that.
 
Back
Top